Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

500
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
500
Communication01:28

Communication

12.2K
Sharing information, concepts, and emotions to foster mutual understanding is communication. The sender, recipient, and transaction must be considered in this manner. The sender is the person who shares the message, the recipient is the person who receives and understands the message, and the transaction is the method used to deliver the message and the variables that affect the communication's context and surroundings. The nurse-client connection is built on therapeutic communication.
12.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

1.1K
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
1.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.9K
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops01:18

Positive and Negative Feedback Loops

25.6K
Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires  maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:
25.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
Same author

The reliability of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand viva examination.

Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine·2026
Same author

Diffusion weighted imaging abnormalities and cerebral ischemia in a cohort of patients on lecanemab.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Dermatoscopy (UVFD) features in Porokeratosis: Findings from a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Dermatology practical & conceptual·2026
Same author

Communication Failures and the Influence of Noise in the Operating Room: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to: "Australian Atherosclerosis Society Position Statement on Lipoprotein(a): Clinical and Implementation Recommendations" [Heart Lung Circ. 32(3) (2023) 287-296.].

Heart, lung & circulation·2026
Same journal

Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.6K

Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm.

Anna Ryan1, Geoffrey J McColl1, Richard O'Brien1

  • 1Department of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Medical Education
|August 24, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Normative feedback may hinder learning for lower-achieving medical students, impacting test performance. Further research is needed to optimize feedback for self-regulated learning in medical education.

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.6K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Learning Sciences
  • Health Professions Education

Background:

  • Self-regulation is crucial for professional practice in medicine.
  • Effective feedback strategies are needed to enhance medical students' self-regulated learning.
  • Understanding student responses to different feedback types is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how medical students respond to various forms and content of written feedback.
  • To explore the impact of different feedback types on study behavior and knowledge acquisition.
  • To identify optimal feedback methods for improving self-regulated learning in medical students.

Main Methods:

  • Year 2 graduate-entry medical students participated in a study involving formative progress tests.
  • Students were randomized into three groups receiving different written feedback reports (content lists, certitude, normative comparisons).
  • A mixed-method approach analyzed progress test scores, exam results, study diaries, questionnaires, and interviews.

Main Results:

  • Feedback including normative comparisons led to poorer test performance in the lowest quartile of students.
  • This feedback type encouraged general study habits over examination-focused preparation.
  • Individualized feedback content requires further investigation for optimal learning outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Medical students, despite perceived homogeneity, may react differently to normative feedback.
  • Caution is advised when providing comparative performance data to students.
  • More research is necessary to develop effective written feedback for enhancing self-regulated learning, especially for students needing the most support.