Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Preoperative effects of mifepristone for dilation and evacuation after 19 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled
K A Shaw1, K Lerma1, J G Shaw2
1Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate mifepristone as an adjunct to, or replacement for, osmotic dilators for cervical preparation in surgical abortion after 19 weeks of gestation.
Design:
Site-stratified, double-blinded randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Two tertiary care teaching hospitals.
Population:
Women undergoing dilation and evacuation at 19-236/7 weeks of gestation from November 2013 through November 2015.
Methods:
Participants were randomised to receive (1) mifepristone alone (n = 27), (2) osmotic dilators with mifepristone (n = 27) or (3) osmotic dilators with placebo (n = 21) with all receiving pre-procedure misoprostol.
Main Outcome Measures:
Operative time, preoperative cervical dilation and complications.
Results:
We enrolled 75 participants; mean gestation 21 weeks. Pre-procedure cervical dilation was ≥3 cm in 4, 52, and 57% of participants in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.005). Mifepristone with misoprostol for cervical preparation resulted in longer procedure times compared with osmotic dilators, with median total procedure times of (1) 18.5 (8-52), (2) 12 (7-25), and (3) 13 (6-26) minutes (P ≤ 0.005). Excluding time required for manual dilation, procedure times were similar: median times from dilation complete to evacuation complete were (1) 10.5 (4-23), (2) 8.5 (5-24), and (3) 10 (4-20) minutes (P = 0.10). Complications occurred in seven cases, six with trainees and one with an attending physician (P = 0.03), with difference by study group not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.12).
Conclusions:
Elimination of osmotic dilators has the potential to decrease burden and opportunity cost of cervical preparation. The longer procedure time, related to manual dilation, is offset by decreasing dilator-related preoperative time and discomfort. Provider experience may impact risk when eliminating dilators.
Tweetable Abstract:
Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to D&E has potential to reduce barriers to care.
More Related Videos
03:01Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
05:33Author Spotlight: Alleviating Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy with Safe and Effective Auricular Acupuncture
Published on: August 4, 2023