Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial Designs in Immuno-oncology Research
Kelley M Kidwell1, Michael A Postow2,3, Katherine S Panageas4
1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. kidwell@umich.edu.
Abstract:
Clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors have led to the approval of anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4), anti-PD-1 (programmed death-1), and anti-PD-L1 (PD-ligand 1) drugs by the FDA for numerous tumor types. In the treatment of metastatic melanoma, combinations of checkpoint inhibitors are more effective than single-agent inhibitors, but combination immunotherapy is associated with increased frequency and severity of toxicity. There are questions about the use of combination immunotherapy or single-agent anti-PD-1 as initial therapy and the number of doses of either approach required to sustain a response. In this article, we describe a novel use of sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design to evaluate immune checkpoint inhibitors to find treatment regimens that adapt within an individual based on intermediate response and lead to the longest overall survival. We provide a hypothetical example SMART design for BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma as a framework for investigating immunotherapy treatment regimens. We compare implementing a SMART design to implementing multiple traditional randomized clinical trials. We illustrate the benefits of a SMART over traditional trial designs and acknowledge the complexity of a SMART. SMART designs may be an optimal way to find treatment strategies that yield durable response, longer survival, and lower toxicity. Clin Cancer Res; 24(4); 730-6. ©2017 AACR.
Insights
Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designs offer a novel approach to optimizing cancer immunotherapy. This adaptive trial method aims to identify the most effective immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens for longer survival and reduced toxicity.
Area of Science:
- Immunology and Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1 are FDA-approved for various cancers.
- Combination immunotherapy shows higher efficacy than single agents in metastatic melanoma but increases toxicity.
- Optimal initial therapy and dosing strategies for ICIs remain under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate the Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design for optimizing cancer immunotherapy.
- To demonstrate how SMART designs can identify adaptive treatment regimens based on individual patient response.
- To compare the efficiency and benefits of SMART designs against traditional randomized clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Description of the SMART design methodology for evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors.
- Presentation of a hypothetical SMART design for BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma.
- Comparative analysis of SMART designs versus multiple traditional randomized trials.
Main Results:
- SMART designs allow for adaptive treatment allocation within individuals based on intermediate response.
- Illustrates the potential benefits of SMART designs over traditional trial structures.
- Acknowledges the inherent complexity in implementing SMART designs.
Conclusions:
- SMART designs represent an optimal strategy for discovering immunotherapy regimens that maximize durable response and survival.
- This adaptive approach may lead to improved patient outcomes with potentially lower toxicity.
- Further exploration of SMART designs is warranted for advancing cancer immunotherapy research.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

