Propagation Speed of Electromagnetic Waves
Distribution of Molecular Speeds
Speed of Sound in Solids and Liquids
Deriving the Speed of Sound in a Liquid
Accelerating Fluids
Instantaneous Velocity - II
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions
Published on: February 22, 2018
Tom Parsons1, Luca Malagnini2, Aybige Akinci2
1U.S. Geological Survey, MS-999, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
This study explores why some earthquakes happen hours or days after distant seismic events. It suggests that the delay is due to fluid diffusion in the crust. When seismic waves pass through, they can increase rock permeability, allowing overpressurized fluids to escape. These fluids may then weaken faults and trigger earthquakes. The delay time depends on earthquake magnitude, as larger events involve larger fluid compartments. The model fits both natural and human-induced earthquake data. The study highlights the importance of fluid dynamics in earthquake mechanics.
Area of Science:
Background:
The mechanisms behind earthquakes triggered by distant seismic events remain unclear. While seismic waves can temporarily stress the crust, observed delays in earthquake initiation are not easily explained by these transient stresses. Some studies report delays lasting hours or days after seismic waves pass. These delays challenge the assumption that seismic waves alone trigger such events. Prior research has shown that distant earthquakes can influence pore fluid pressure and distribution in the crust. Earth's crust contains isolated, pressurized fluid compartments bounded by low-permeability rock. Seismic shaking can alter rock permeability, potentially releasing overpressurized fluids. These fluids may then infiltrate faults and reduce their strength, possibly leading to earthquakes.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aims to explain the observed delays between seismic wave passage and earthquake initiation. The researchers investigate whether these delays can be attributed to fluid diffusion processes. They consider the role of pressurized fluid compartments in the crust. The study focuses on how changes in permeability affect fluid movement and fault strength. It examines whether fluid diffusion can account for the magnitude-dependent delays. The researchers also assess the relevance of these findings to human-induced seismicity. The goal is to determine if a critical nucleation zone model applies to both natural and induced earthquakes. The study seeks to clarify the relationship between fluid dynamics and earthquake nucleation.
Main Methods:
The researchers analyzed earthquake data with reported delays after seismic wave passage. They examined the correlation between delay times and earthquake magnitudes. A fluid diffusion model was used to simulate the behavior of pressurized fluid compartments. The model considered changes in permeability caused by seismic shaking. The study incorporated known properties of crustal fluid compartments and fault systems. The researchers tested whether the model could replicate observed delay patterns. They evaluated the fit between modeled and observed nucleation times. The analysis included comparisons with human-induced earthquake data to test the model's applicability.
Main Results:
The study found that delays between seismic wave passage and earthquake initiation increase with magnitude. The best fit for these delays was achieved using a fluid diffusion model. The model suggests that unlocking a critical nucleation zone is necessary for rupture. The delay times align with the time required for fluids to diffuse through low-permeability boundaries. The study shows that permeability changes caused by seismic waves can release overpressurized fluids. These fluids may then infiltrate faults and reduce their strength. The results support the idea that fluid dynamics play a key role in earthquake nucleation. The model also fits data from human-induced earthquakes, suggesting a shared mechanism.
Conclusions:
The researchers propose that fluid diffusion processes explain the observed delays in earthquake initiation. They suggest that unlocking a critical nucleation zone is essential for rupture to occur. The study supports the idea that pressurized fluid compartments influence fault behavior. The findings align with the known effects of seismic waves on rock permeability. The model fits both natural and human-induced earthquake data. The study highlights the importance of considering fluid dynamics in earthquake mechanics. The results suggest that fluid release and diffusion are key factors in delayed earthquake nucleation. The researchers do not claim that fluid processes are the only mechanism for earthquake triggering.
The researchers propose that fluid diffusion processes account for these delays, as overpressurized fluids need time to infiltrate faults.
Seismic waves can increase rock permeability, allowing previously confined fluids to diffuse and reduce fault strength.
The model suggests that unlocking a magnitude-dependent nucleation zone is necessary for rupture to occur.
Yes, the study shows that the fluid diffusion model fits data from both natural and human-induced seismic events.
The study found that delay times increase with earthquake magnitude, aligning with fluid diffusion timescales.
The researchers propose that fluid dynamics are a key factor in delayed earthquake nucleation, especially in pressurized compartments.