Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation Speed of Electromagnetic Waves01:30

Propagation Speed of Electromagnetic Waves

4.8K
Electromagnetic waves are consistent with Ampere's law. Assuming there is no conduction current Ampere's law is given as:
4.8K
Distribution of Molecular Speeds01:27

Distribution of Molecular Speeds

5.7K
The motion of molecules in a gas is random in magnitude and direction for individual molecules, but a gas of many molecules has a predictable distribution of molecular speeds. This predictable distribution of molecular speeds is known as the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. The distribution of molecular speeds in liquids is comparable to that of gases but not identical and can help to understand the phenomenon of the boiling and vapor pressure of a liquid. Consider that a molecule requires a...
5.7K
Speed of Sound in Solids and Liquids00:51

Speed of Sound in Solids and Liquids

4.0K
Most solids and liquids are incompressible—their densities remain constant throughout. In the presence of an external force, the molecules tend to restore to their original positions, which is only possible because the constituents interact. The interactions help the constituents pass on information about external disturbances, like sound waves. Therefore, sound waves travel faster through these media. Compared to solids, the constituents in a liquid are less tightly bound. Thus, sound...
4.0K
Deriving the Speed of Sound in a Liquid01:09

Deriving the Speed of Sound in a Liquid

999
As with waves on a string, the speed of sound or a mechanical wave in a fluid depends on the fluid's elastic modulus and inertia. The two relevant physical quantities are the bulk modulus and the density of the material. Indeed, it turns out that the relationship between speed and the bulk modulus and density in fluids is the same as that between the speed and the Young's modulus and density in solids.
The speed of sound in fluids can be derived by considering a mechanical wave...
999
Accelerating Fluids01:17

Accelerating Fluids

2.3K
When a fluid is in constant acceleration, the pressure and buoyant force equations are modified. Suppose a beaker is placed in an elevator accelerating upward with a constant acceleration, a. In the beaker, assume there is a thin cylinder of height h with an infinitesimal cross-sectional area, ΔS.
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:
2.3K
Instantaneous Velocity - II01:10

Instantaneous Velocity - II

14.3K
Instantaneous velocity is the quantity that measures how fast an object is moving along its path. In other words, the instantaneous velocity of an object is the limit of the average velocity as the elapsed time approaches zero, or the derivative of displacement with respect to time. Like average velocity, the instantaneous velocity is a vector with the dimensions of length per unit time. Instantaneous velocity can have both positive and negative values. The instantaneous velocity can be...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seismic attenuation transients reveal progressive crustal modification before and during the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

DYRK1A antagonists rescue degeneration and behavioural deficits of in vivo models based on amyloid-β, Tau and DYRK1A neurotoxicity.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

DYRK1a Inhibitor Mediated Rescue of <i>Drosophila</i> Models of Alzheimer's Disease-Down Syndrome Phenotypes.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2022
Same author

Predictors of Positive Outcomes and a Scoring System to Guide Management After Fasciotomy for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2022
Same author

Effects of Eph/ephrin signalling and human Alzheimer's disease-associated EphA1 on Drosophila behaviour and neurophysiology.

Neurobiology of disease·2022
Same author

From coseismic offsets to fault-block mountains.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions
11:51

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions

Published on: February 22, 2018

9.2K

Nucleation speed limit on remote fluid-induced earthquakes.

Tom Parsons1, Luca Malagnini2, Aybige Akinci2

  • 1U.S. Geological Survey, MS-999, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.

Science Advances
|August 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study explores why some earthquakes happen hours or days after distant seismic events. It suggests that the delay is due to fluid diffusion in the crust. When seismic waves pass through, they can increase rock permeability, allowing overpressurized fluids to escape. These fluids may then weaken faults and trigger earthquakes. The delay time depends on earthquake magnitude, as larger events involve larger fluid compartments. The model fits both natural and human-induced earthquake data. The study highlights the importance of fluid dynamics in earthquake mechanics.

Keywords:
seismic triggeringpore fluid pressurecrustal permeabilityearthquake mechanics

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Fast Imaging Technique to Study Drop Impact Dynamics of Non-Newtonian Fluids
10:09

Fast Imaging Technique to Study Drop Impact Dynamics of Non-Newtonian Fluids

Published on: March 5, 2014

12.9K
Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System
08:19

Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System

Published on: May 9, 2021

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions
11:51

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions

Published on: February 22, 2018

9.2K
Fast Imaging Technique to Study Drop Impact Dynamics of Non-Newtonian Fluids
10:09

Fast Imaging Technique to Study Drop Impact Dynamics of Non-Newtonian Fluids

Published on: March 5, 2014

12.9K
Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System
08:19

Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System

Published on: May 9, 2021

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Seismology and tectonics
  • Geofluid dynamics
  • Earthquake mechanics

Background:

The mechanisms behind earthquakes triggered by distant seismic events remain unclear. While seismic waves can temporarily stress the crust, observed delays in earthquake initiation are not easily explained by these transient stresses. Some studies report delays lasting hours or days after seismic waves pass. These delays challenge the assumption that seismic waves alone trigger such events. Prior research has shown that distant earthquakes can influence pore fluid pressure and distribution in the crust. Earth's crust contains isolated, pressurized fluid compartments bounded by low-permeability rock. Seismic shaking can alter rock permeability, potentially releasing overpressurized fluids. These fluids may then infiltrate faults and reduce their strength, possibly leading to earthquakes.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to explain the observed delays between seismic wave passage and earthquake initiation. The researchers investigate whether these delays can be attributed to fluid diffusion processes. They consider the role of pressurized fluid compartments in the crust. The study focuses on how changes in permeability affect fluid movement and fault strength. It examines whether fluid diffusion can account for the magnitude-dependent delays. The researchers also assess the relevance of these findings to human-induced seismicity. The goal is to determine if a critical nucleation zone model applies to both natural and induced earthquakes. The study seeks to clarify the relationship between fluid dynamics and earthquake nucleation.

Main Methods:

The researchers analyzed earthquake data with reported delays after seismic wave passage. They examined the correlation between delay times and earthquake magnitudes. A fluid diffusion model was used to simulate the behavior of pressurized fluid compartments. The model considered changes in permeability caused by seismic shaking. The study incorporated known properties of crustal fluid compartments and fault systems. The researchers tested whether the model could replicate observed delay patterns. They evaluated the fit between modeled and observed nucleation times. The analysis included comparisons with human-induced earthquake data to test the model's applicability.

Main Results:

The study found that delays between seismic wave passage and earthquake initiation increase with magnitude. The best fit for these delays was achieved using a fluid diffusion model. The model suggests that unlocking a critical nucleation zone is necessary for rupture. The delay times align with the time required for fluids to diffuse through low-permeability boundaries. The study shows that permeability changes caused by seismic waves can release overpressurized fluids. These fluids may then infiltrate faults and reduce their strength. The results support the idea that fluid dynamics play a key role in earthquake nucleation. The model also fits data from human-induced earthquakes, suggesting a shared mechanism.

Conclusions:

The researchers propose that fluid diffusion processes explain the observed delays in earthquake initiation. They suggest that unlocking a critical nucleation zone is essential for rupture to occur. The study supports the idea that pressurized fluid compartments influence fault behavior. The findings align with the known effects of seismic waves on rock permeability. The model fits both natural and human-induced earthquake data. The study highlights the importance of considering fluid dynamics in earthquake mechanics. The results suggest that fluid release and diffusion are key factors in delayed earthquake nucleation. The researchers do not claim that fluid processes are the only mechanism for earthquake triggering.

The researchers propose that fluid diffusion processes account for these delays, as overpressurized fluids need time to infiltrate faults.

Seismic waves can increase rock permeability, allowing previously confined fluids to diffuse and reduce fault strength.

The model suggests that unlocking a magnitude-dependent nucleation zone is necessary for rupture to occur.

Yes, the study shows that the fluid diffusion model fits data from both natural and human-induced seismic events.

The study found that delay times increase with earthquake magnitude, aligning with fluid diffusion timescales.

The researchers propose that fluid dynamics are a key factor in delayed earthquake nucleation, especially in pressurized compartments.