Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction in action: Toward an empirical science of active inference.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

The act of detecting a stimulus contaminates measures of conscious experience with decision biases.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Phasic and tonic arousal distinctly shape human decision bias.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Grounding distractor inhibition in action control: Implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Moving intentions from brains to machines.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

How early does attention modulate visual information processing? The importance of experimental protocol and data

Heleen A Slagter1,2, Josipa Alilovic1,2, Simon Van Gaal1,2

  • 1a Department of Psychology , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.

Cognitive Neuroscience
|August 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Spatial attention

Keywords:
C1EEGERPV1selective attentionspatial attention

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Neuroscience

Background:

  • The influence of attention on early visual processing in the primary visual cortex (V1) is a long-standing scientific debate.
  • Previous research suggested that spatial attention enhances feedforward processing in human V1, indicated by the C1 event-related potential (ERP) component.
  • Replication studies are crucial for validating influential findings in neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the ongoing debate regarding attention's influence on afferent information processing in V1.
  • To present findings from a null replication study concerning spatial attention and V1 processing.
  • To identify factors that may explain discrepancies in the current literature.

Main Methods:

  • A null replication of a key study investigating spatial attention and V1 processing.
  • Analysis of event-related potential (ERP) components, specifically the C1 component.
  • Examination of potential moderating factors such as analytic approach, experimental design, and motivational influences.

Main Results:

  • The replication study yielded null findings, contrasting with the original influential study.
  • The amplitude of the C1 ERP component, used as a neural marker, did not show enhancement with spatial attention in the replication.
  • Discrepancies between studies suggest the need for further investigation into methodological and contextual variables.

Conclusions:

  • The current findings challenge the robustness of the original claim that spatial attention directly enhances feedforward processing in human V1.
  • Further research is needed to systematically investigate factors like analytical methods, experimental design, and participant motivation.
  • Resolving these discrepancies will clarify the precise mechanisms through which attention modulates early visual cortical processing.