Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.3K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.3K
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation01:10

In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

417
In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
417

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiology in Cape Town, South Africa, and implications for future outbreaks in low-income communities.

PLOS global public health·2025
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiology in Cape Town, South Africa, and implications for future outbreaks in low-income communities.

PLOS global public health·2024
Same author

Field study to determine the reliability of HIV viral load results shows minimal impact of delayed testing in South Africa.

African journal of laboratory medicine·2024
Same author

Rapid testing for respiratory syncytial virus in a resource-limited paediatric intensive care setting.

African journal of laboratory medicine·2024
Same author

Epidemiology and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with anti-nucleocapsid seropositivity in Cape Town, South Africa.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2022
Same author

Reduced amplification efficiency of the RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase target enables tracking of the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant using routine diagnostic tests.

Journal of virological methods·2022
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids
09:57

Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids

Published on: March 17, 2016

29.2K

Basic overview of method validation in the clinical virology laboratory.

Howard Newman1, Jean Maritz2

  • 1National Health Laboratory Service, Port Elizabeth, South Africa and Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Virology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Reviews in Medical Virology
|September 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This review explains how clinical virology labs can ensure their diagnostic tests are accurate and reliable. It focuses on the processes of validation and verification, which are required before tests can be used in patient care. The study outlines statistical methods and acceptance criteria that labs can use to evaluate test performance. It also highlights the need for standardized practices, as current guidelines are not always clear. The authors suggest that these approaches may help labs meet quality standards and provide trustworthy results for clinicians.

Keywords:
acceptability criteriaclinical virology laboratorystatistical analysisvalidationverificationclinical virology testingdiagnostic validationlaboratory quality assurancetest verification process

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices
08:53

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices

Published on: October 3, 2016

19.1K
Using a Pan-Viral Microarray Assay Virochip to Screen Clinical Samples for Viral Pathogens
13:45

Using a Pan-Viral Microarray Assay Virochip to Screen Clinical Samples for Viral Pathogens

Published on: April 27, 2011

19.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids
09:57

Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids

Published on: March 17, 2016

29.2K
Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices
08:53

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices

Published on: October 3, 2016

19.1K
Using a Pan-Viral Microarray Assay Virochip to Screen Clinical Samples for Viral Pathogens
13:45

Using a Pan-Viral Microarray Assay Virochip to Screen Clinical Samples for Viral Pathogens

Published on: April 27, 2011

19.5K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical virology
  • Laboratory medicine
  • Diagnostic testing validation

Background:

Diagnostic virology labs play a critical role in healthcare by supplying clinicians with data to guide treatment decisions. Ensuring the accuracy of diagnostic results is vital for patient care. Laboratories must validate in-house tests or verify commercial assays before use. However, the process is complex due to the range of qualitative and quantitative virology tests available. Accreditation bodies require validation or verification but do not always specify how to perform these steps. This lack of standardized guidance creates challenges for labs seeking to meet quality standards. Prior research has shown that validation processes vary widely across disciplines. No prior work had resolved how to standardize validation for virology tests. This uncertainty drove the need for a structured review of validation practices. The gap motivated the authors to synthesize current approaches in clinical virology.

Purpose Of The Study:

This review aims to provide a clear framework for validation and verification processes in clinical virology labs. It addresses the lack of standardized guidelines for these procedures. The specific problem is the absence of explicit instructions for validating or verifying virology tests. The motivation comes from the need to ensure diagnostic reliability in clinical settings. The study focuses on explaining how to perform validation and verification experiments. It also covers statistical analysis and acceptance criteria. The goal is to help labs meet accreditation requirements. The authors aim to clarify the steps involved in these processes.

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a literature review to gather existing validation and verification practices. They synthesized information from multiple guidelines and standards. The approach involved identifying common themes in validation methodologies. They examined statistical methods used in virology testing. The review included analysis of acceptance and rejection criteria. They focused on how these criteria are applied in clinical virology. The methods section explains how to design validation experiments. It also outlines statistical tools for evaluating test performance.

Main Results:

The review highlights the importance of statistical analysis in validation processes. It explains how to calculate sensitivity and specificity for virology tests. Acceptance criteria often include thresholds for test accuracy. Rejection criteria are based on failure to meet these thresholds. The study shows that validation involves both qualitative and quantitative measures. It emphasizes the need for reproducibility in test results. The authors note that verification typically involves fewer experiments than validation. The results suggest that statistical tools like ROC curves are commonly used.

Conclusions:

The authors conclude that validation and verification are essential for reliable virology testing. They propose that statistical methods should guide these processes. The study suggests that acceptance criteria must be clearly defined. The authors state that reproducibility is a key factor in validation. They emphasize the need for standardized approaches across labs. The review does not claim that all labs follow the same procedures. The authors suggest that further work may clarify best practices. Their findings may help labs meet accreditation requirements.

The main goal is to ensure diagnostic tests are reliable and meet quality standards before implementation.

Validation applies to in-house tests, while verification is for FDA-approved or CE-labeled commercial assays.

Statistical analysis helps determine test accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for reliable results.

Acceptance criteria often include thresholds for test sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.

ROC curves are used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy by plotting sensitivity against specificity.

The authors suggest that standardized approaches may improve consistency across diagnostic virology labs.