Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Department for Continuing Education, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Including gray literature in systematic reviews enhances evidence analysis by reducing publication bias and providing comprehensive data. A strategic search for this non-commercially published evidence is crucial for balanced research findings.
Area of Science:
- Evidence-based practice
- Information science
- Research methodology
Background:
- Systematic reviews require comprehensive evidence identification.
- Gray literature offers valuable data often absent in commercial publications.
- Gray literature can mitigate publication bias and improve review timeliness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the benefits of incorporating gray literature into systematic reviews.
- To provide guidance on searching gray literature sources.
- To illustrate the contribution of gray literature to systematic reviews.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of existing literature on gray literature.
- Discussion of benefits and challenges of gray literature searching.
- Presentation of an illustrative search example.
Main Results:
- Gray literature can include theses, dissertations, reports, and conference papers.
- Inclusion of gray literature reduces publication bias and enhances review comprehensiveness.
- Despite search challenges, gray literature benefits often outweigh costs.
Conclusions:
- Gray literature is essential for a balanced and complete picture of available evidence.
- A well-designed gray literature search strategy is invaluable for systematic reviews.
- Researchers should prioritize incorporating gray literature into their systematic review processes.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Archival Research
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...