Yield of Anaerobic Blood Cultures in Pediatric Emergency Department Patients

Itai Gross1, Oren Gordon1, Wiessam Abu Ahmad1

  • 1From the Department of Pediatrics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah and The Hebrew University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah and The Hebrew University Medical Center, Department of Neonatology, and Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hadassah and The Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

Insights

Anaerobic bacteremia is rare in children, but using anaerobic blood cultures in pediatric emergency departments can increase the detection of infections. This study re-evaluated the utility of these cultures in identifying rare cases.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Bacteriology

Background:

  • Current recommendations discourage routine anaerobic cultures in children due to perceived rarity of anaerobic bacteremia.
  • Recent data on the incidence and diagnostic utility of anaerobic blood cultures in pediatric populations are limited.
  • Pediatric emergency department (PED) policy maintained the use of both aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures, enabling this study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the incidence and yield of anaerobic blood cultures in a pediatric emergency department setting.
  • To assess the characteristics and risk factors associated with anaerobic bacteremia in children.
  • To determine the contribution of anaerobic cultures to the overall detection of bacteremia.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of blood cultures from a tertiary care center's PED between 2002 and 2016.
  • Assessment of the incidence and clinical significance of positive anaerobic blood cultures.
  • Identification of risk factors for anaerobic bacteremia in pediatric patients.

Main Results:

  • Out of 68,304 blood culture sets, 971 (1.42%) were clinically significant positive cultures.
  • Pathogenic anaerobic bacteria were isolated in 33 (0.05%) cultures.
  • Head and neck abscess and intra-abdominal infections were primary risk factors for anaerobic bacteremia.
  • Anaerobic cultures uniquely identified 187 (22%) true positive cases that would have been missed otherwise.

Conclusions:

  • True anaerobic bacteremia is infrequent in children presenting to the PED.
  • Despite its rarity, the inclusion of anaerobic cultures can enhance the overall diagnostic yield of blood cultures in pediatric patients.
Abstract