Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations
Published on: October 28, 2022
Genetic sampling for estimating density of common species
Ellen Cheng1,2, Karen E Hodges3, Rahel Sollmann4
1Daniel B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens GA USA.
Noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) provides reliable population density estimates for common species like snowshoe hares, comparable to traditional methods. This cost-effective approach requires optimized field and lab protocols for widespread application.
Area of Science:
- Wildlife ecology and population biology
- Conservation genetics and noninvasive sampling techniques
- Mammalian population estimation
Background:
- Accurate population density estimates are crucial for understanding population dynamics.
- Noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) is cost-effective for rare or elusive species.
- The applicability of NGS to common, widely distributed species remains less explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) for estimating snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) population density.
- To compare NGS-derived population estimates with traditional live-trapping methods.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness and optimize protocols for NGS in a common species.
Main Methods:
- Optimized a single-session noninvasive genetic sampling protocol for snowshoe hares.
- Collected genetic samples (pellets) from a high density of sampling plots.
- Compared spatial capture-recapture population estimates from NGS with live-trapping data.
- Analyzed laboratory and field costs associated with NGS and live trapping.
Main Results:
- Noninvasive genetic sampling yielded population density estimates comparable to live trapping.
- NGS required a higher density of sampling plots compared to live trapping for similar precision.
- Optimal NGS protocol involved 160 sampling plots over 4 days with single pellet genotyping.
- NGS laboratory costs ranged from $670 to $3000 USD per site; field costs were lower than live trapping in difficult terrain.
Conclusions:
- Noninvasive genetic sampling is a viable method for estimating population densities of common species like snowshoe hares.
- Developing cost-effective NGS protocols requires careful field and laboratory pilot testing.
- NGS offers a potentially more cost-effective alternative to live trapping, especially in challenging environments.
Related Concept Videos
What are Populations and Communities?
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Genetic Drift
Bootstrapping
What is Population Genetics?
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...

