Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview01:12

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview

807
Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
807
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling01:27

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

2.8K
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
2.8K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.6K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.6K
¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling01:04

¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling

1.9K
The probability of having two carbon-13 atoms next to each other is negligible because of the low natural abundance of carbon-13. Consequently, peak splitting due to carbon-carbon spin-spin coupling is not observed in spectra. However, protons up to three sigma bonds away split the carbon signal according to the n+1 rule, resulting in complicated spectra.
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
1.9K
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control01:21

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control

426
Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
426
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Granger Causality on forward and Reversed Time Series.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

FitzHugh-Nagumo oscillators on complex networks mimic epileptic-seizure-related synchronization phenomena.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

Translation-Invariant Kernels for Multivariable Approximation.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2020
Same author

Implementation of two causal methods based on predictions in reconstructed state spaces.

Physical review. E·2020
Same author

Causal network discovery by iterative conditioning: Comparison of algorithms.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

Chimera states in brain networks: Empirical neural vs. modular fractal connectivity.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2020
Same journal

Gap junction architecture and synchronization clusters in the thalamic reticular nuclei.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Exact computation of Lyapunov exponents via system parameters in multi-triangle chaotic maps: Bifurcation analysis and circuit realization.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Integrating score-based generative modeling and neural ODEs for accurate representation of multiscale chaotic dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

A data-driven tuberculosis model with behavioral changes and saturated treatment: Optimal control and cost-effectiveness study.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Breathers, rational solutions, and their exact physical spectra in F = 1 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Finite invariant sets with bridging points in logistic IFS.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection
08:01

Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection

Published on: December 15, 2015

8.0K

Detection of coupling delay: A problem not yet solved.

David Coufal1, Jozef Jakubík2, Nikola Jajcay1

  • 1Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, 182 07 Praha 8, Czech Republic.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|September 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Detecting coupling delays in nonlinear systems using conditional mutual information (CMI) and convergent cross mapping (CCM) is unreliable. Both methods struggle with oscillatory dynamics, indicating the problem is not yet solved.

More Related Videos

Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments
05:19

Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments

Published on: November 12, 2019

7.6K
DetectSyn: A Rapid, Unbiased Fluorescent Method to Detect Changes in Synapse Density
09:10

DetectSyn: A Rapid, Unbiased Fluorescent Method to Detect Changes in Synapse Density

Published on: July 22, 2022

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection
08:01

Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection

Published on: December 15, 2015

8.0K
Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments
05:19

Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments

Published on: November 12, 2019

7.6K
DetectSyn: A Rapid, Unbiased Fluorescent Method to Detect Changes in Synapse Density
09:10

DetectSyn: A Rapid, Unbiased Fluorescent Method to Detect Changes in Synapse Density

Published on: July 22, 2022

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Nonlinear Dynamics
  • Complex Systems Analysis
  • Time Series Analysis

Background:

  • Coupling delay detection is crucial for understanding interactions in dynamical systems.
  • Nonparametric methods offer model-free approaches to identify these delays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability of two nonparametric methods for detecting coupling delays.
  • To compare the performance of the Conditional Mutual Information (CMI) and Convergent Cross Mapping (CCM) methods.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations of unidirectionally and bidirectionally coupled continuous-time and discrete-time nonlinear dynamical systems.
  • Assessment of the Conditional Mutual Information (CMI) method (transfer entropy).
  • Assessment of the Convergent Cross Mapping (CCM) method.

Main Results:

  • Neither CMI nor CCM methods are generally reliable for coupling delay detection.
  • CMI showed higher sensitivity in continuous-time chaotic systems, while CCM was more sensitive in discrete-time systems.
  • Both methods produced ambiguous results for systems with strong oscillatory components.

Conclusions:

  • Nonparametric detection of coupling delay remains a significant challenge.
  • Results from CMI and CCM methods require careful interpretation, especially in oscillatory systems.
  • Further research is needed to develop robust methods for coupling delay estimation.