Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing Accessibility Auditing Methods for Ebooks: Crowdsourced, Functionality-Led Versus Web Content

Abi James1, E A Draffan1, Mike Wald1

  • 1WAIS, ECS, University of Southampton, UK.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|September 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trust, risk perception, and intention to use autonomous vehicles: an interdisciplinary bibliometric review.

AI & society·2025
Same author

Climbing crags recommender system in Arco, Italy: a comparative study.

Frontiers in big data·2023
Same author

Indocyanine Green in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Obesity surgery·2023
Same author

Reflections on Building a Multi-Country AAC Implementation Guide.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2023
Same author

AI Supporting AAC Pictographic Symbol Adaptations.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2023
Same author

Exploring Practical Metrics to Support Automatic Speech Recognition Evaluations.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2023
Same journal

A GenAI Pipeline for Violinist Kinematic Data Management.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

AMAL-For-Qatar: A Comprehensive AI Ecosystem for Fetal Ultrasound Analysis - Project Overview and Achievements.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Treatment-Aware Multimodal AI for Dermatology: A Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Predicting Postpartum Depression Using Imbalance-Aware Machine Learning.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Validation of Deep-Learning Models for Autosegmentation of Brain Metastases.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Delay-Dependent Gating in Modular RNNs.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
See all related articles

This study compares non-expert ebook accessibility reviews with developer standards. Combining both offers better functional accessibility information for users with print impairments.

Area of Science:

  • Digital accessibility
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Assistive technology

Background:

  • Crowdsourcing offers scalable functional accessibility evaluations of digital content.
  • Technical accessibility standards guide developers but may not fully capture user experience.
  • A gap exists between perceived and technical accessibility in digital publications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the discrepancies between crowdsourced ebook accessibility evaluations and developer-centric technical standards.
  • To demonstrate the benefits of integrating crowdsourced and technical approaches for accessibility.
  • To improve accessibility information for individuals with print impairments.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of crowdsourced functional accessibility data and technical accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG).
Keywords:
Accessibilitydisabilitiese-booksinternetstandards and standardisationweb apps and tools

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of ebook accessibility using both non-expert user feedback and developer checklists.
  • Identification of specific areas where functional and technical evaluations diverge.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences were observed between functional accessibility reported by non-expert crowdsourcers and technical compliance.
    • Certain technical standards do not adequately address all functional accessibility barriers encountered by users.
    • Integrating both evaluation methods provides a more comprehensive accessibility profile for ebooks.

    Conclusions:

    • A hybrid approach combining crowdsourced functional evaluations and technical standards is crucial for robust ebook accessibility.
    • This integrated method enhances the utility of accessibility information for a broader user base, particularly those with print impairments.
    • Future accessibility efforts should leverage both user-centric and developer-centric perspectives for inclusive digital content.