Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

07:32
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
2.0K
Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance angles obtained using radiographic and protrusive occlusal record
Oh-Kyun Kwon1, Seung-Won Yang1, Jee-Hwan Kim1
1Department of Prosthodontics, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
|September 7, 2017
Summary
This study found strong correlations between the sagittal condylar guidance angles (SCGAs) measured using panoramic and CBCT radiographic images and those determined by the protrusive occlusal record. These findings suggest radiographic methods can reliably assess SCGAs.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Radiology
- Orthodontics
Background:
- Sagittal condylar guidance angles (SCGAs) are crucial for understanding jaw movements and occlusal relationships.
- Accurate measurement of SCGAs is essential for prosthodontic and orthodontic treatment planning.
- Traditional methods for SCGAs measurement, like the protrusive occlusal record, can be time-consuming and operator-dependent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare sagittal condylar guidance angles (SCGAs) measured from panoramic and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with those obtained from a protrusive occlusal record.
- To evaluate the reliability and correlation of radiographic SCGA measurements against a standard clinical method.
Main Methods:
- SCGAs were measured in 20 patients using a protrusive interocclusal record on a semi-adjustable articulator.
- Panoramic and CBCT images (panoramic and cross-sections) were acquired for each patient.
- Measurements utilized the Frankfort horizontal reference line and mean curvature line on radiographic images, with data analyzed using t-tests and Pearson's correlation.
Main Results:
- Mean SCGAs varied across methods: protrusive record (30.1-30.2°), panoramic (38.7-38.9°), CBCT panoramic sections (35.4-36.8°), and CBCT cross sections (35.3-36.1°).
- Significant differences were observed among the SCGA measurement groups.
- Strong positive correlations were found between radiographic and protrusive occlusal record measurements (Pearson's r: 0.791-0.918).
Conclusions:
- Radiographic imaging, particularly CBCT, demonstrates strong correlation with the protrusive occlusal record for SCGA measurement.
- Panoramic and CBCT imaging offer viable, potentially more efficient alternatives for assessing sagittal condylar guidance angles.
- These findings support the use of radiographic techniques in clinical practice for evaluating SCGAs.

