Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.6K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.6K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.8K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.8K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

61.7K
Overview
61.7K
Proofreading01:31

Proofreading

9.3K
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore,  it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
9.3K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

65.5K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
65.5K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

57.5K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
57.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antinuclear antibodies in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss: prevalence and impact on subsequent pregnancy outcome.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026
Same author

Back to the future! Is there still a role for the GnRH agonist protocol in ovarian stimulation?

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026
Same author

An advanced SWOT analysis of elective vitrification: today's standard IVF procedure.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026
Same author

Can oral dydrogesterone mitigate adverse outcomes with low progesterone on transfer day in natural-cycle frozen embryo transfer?

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026
Same author

Dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer (REMODEL): a pilot prospective randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2026
Same author

Managing suspected endometrial polyps during IVF/ICSI stimulation: retrospective cohort study of fresh versus freeze-all strategies.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

18.4K

Review the 'peer review'.

Christophe Blockeel1, Panagiotis Drakopoulos2, Nikolaos P Polyzos3

  • 1Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussel, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

Reproductive Biomedicine Online
|September 10, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Peer review, a century-old scientific appraisal method, needs improvement. Focusing on methodology and reviewer training is crucial for enhancing the quality and accuracy of scientific publications.

Keywords:
Evidence-basedPeer reviewReviewScientific quality

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

18.4K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.9K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Academic research appraisal

Background:

  • Peer review is the primary method for evaluating scientific research for over 100 years.
  • It ensures research meets standards for quality, accuracy, relevance, and novelty before dissemination.
  • Despite its importance, peer review is recognized as imperfect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight key areas for improving the scientific peer review process.
  • To emphasize the need for enhanced reviewer training and a focus on research methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the established practices and limitations of scientific peer review.
  • Identification of critical components for effective peer review.

Main Results:

  • The current peer review system, while standard, has significant flaws.
  • Methodology and reviewer training are identified as critical areas needing attention.

Conclusions:

  • Peer review requires enhancements to maintain its role as the gold standard in science.
  • Developing clear guidelines for reviewers is essential for improving the process and ensuring research integrity.