Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

10:24
Morris Water Maze Test: Optimization for Mouse Strain and Testing Environment
Published on: June 22, 2015
22.5K
Adapted Morris Water Maze protocol to prevent interference from confounding motor deficits on cognitive functioning.
Mattias De Coninck1, Debby Van Dam1,2, Chris Van Ginneken3
1a Laboratory for Neurochemistry and Behaviour , Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp , Wilrijk , Belgium.
Somatosensory & Motor Research
|September 12, 2017
Summary
Motor deficits in hemicerebellectomized (HCX) mice can confound Morris Water Maze (MWM) cognitive assessments. An adapted MWM protocol successfully excluded motor impairments as a confounding factor in spatial learning.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Background:
- The Morris Water Maze (MWM) is a common tool for assessing spatial learning and memory.
- Motor deficits can significantly confound MWM results, making it difficult to isolate cognitive effects.
- Hemicerebellectomy (HCX) in mice provides a model with lateralized motor deficits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of motor deficits on cognitive functioning in the MWM.
- To assess the confounding effect of motor deficits in hemicerebellectomized (HCX) mice using a lateralized study.
- To develop and validate an adapted MWM protocol that mitigates the influence of motor impairments.
Main Methods:
- Spatial learning was evaluated in adult mice after left or right hemicerebellectomy (HCX).
- Two MWM designs were employed: a traditional (Trad) MWM and an adapted (Adap) MWM with altered starting positions.
- Path length was used as the primary measure to assess spatial learning and the influence of motor deficits.
Main Results:
- In the Trad MWM, left HCX mice showed impaired spatial learning and memory compared to controls.
- These deficits observed in the Trad MWM disappeared in the Adap MWM when starting positions were mirrored.
- The findings imply that motor phenotype and increased task difficulty, not cognitive deficits alone, contributed to the results in the Trad MWM.
Conclusions:
- Motor impairments in HCX mice can confound MWM performance, leading to inaccurate assessments of cognitive function.
- The adapted MWM protocol effectively circumvents motor deficits as a confounding factor.
- This adapted MWM approach allows for a more accurate evaluation of cognitive MWM parameters, excluding motor influences.

