Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026
13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
10.4K
Notes on measurement theory for causal-formative indicators: A reply to Hardin
Kenneth A Bollen1, Adamantios Diamantopoulos2
1Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina.
Psychological Methods
|September 12, 2017
Summary
This rejoinder addresses research questions on causal-formative indicators, defending their use in research. It clarifies theoretical support for employing these measurement tools in empirical studies.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Psychometrics
- Research Methodology
Background:
- A prior commentary questioned the theoretical underpinnings of causal-formative indicators.
- This article responds to specific research questions posed in that commentary.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a rejoinder to a commentary on causal-formative indicators.
- To address and answer six research questions regarding the use of causal-formative indicators.
- To defend the theoretical basis for employing causal-formative indicators in research.
Main Methods:
- Theoretical argumentation.
- Response to specific research questions.
- Literature review and synthesis.
Main Results:
- The article clarifies the role and theoretical justification of causal-formative indicators.
- It addresses concerns about the application and interpretation of these indicators.
- The rejoinder reinforces the validity of causal-formative indicators when properly applied.
Conclusions:
- The theoretical basis for causal-formative indicators is robust and defensible.
- Further dialogue is encouraged to refine the understanding and application of these indicators.
- The article contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate on measurement in the social sciences.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
641
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
641
02:39Indicators
61.3K
Certain organic substances change color in dilute solution when the hydronium ion concentration reaches a particular value. For example, phenolphthalein is a colorless substance in any aqueous solution with a hydronium ion concentration greater than 5.0 × 10−9 M (pH < 8.3). In more basic solutions where the hydronium ion concentration is less than 5.0 × 10−9 M (pH > 8.3), it is red or pink. Substances such as phenolphthalein, which can be used to determine the pH of a solution, are...
61.3K
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
1.4K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.4K
01:30Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
01:29Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
714
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
714
01:53Cause and Effect
12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K