Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

434
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
434
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

595
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
595

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ROS-Responsive Polyprodrug Co-Delivery of Curcumin and Cinnamaldehyde to Disrupt Tumor Redox Homeostasis for Anticancer Therapy.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Indocyanine green-based nanomedicine for theranostic applications.

Biomaterials science·2025
Same author

Dynamic Monolayer WSe<sub>2</sub> Electrolyte-Gated Transistor with Coexistent Double Relaxation Timescale for Enhanced Physical Reservoir Computing.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

A New Correlation Measure for Belief Functions and Their Application in Data Fusion.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

IMF-PR: An Improved Morton-Filter-Based Pseudonym-Revocation Scheme in VANETs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Effects of the genetic knockout of the β-1,3-galactosyltransferase 2 on spatial learning and neurons in the adult mouse hippocampus and somatosensory cortex.

Neuroreport·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.2K

Fuzzy Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using a D Numbers Based Multi-Sensor Information Fusion

Xinyang Deng1, Wen Jiang2

  • 1School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China. xinyang.deng@nwpu.edu.cn.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces D numbers for fuzzy risk evaluation in Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). This novel approach improves reliability by addressing non-exclusive fuzzy evaluations in risk assessment.

Keywords:
D numbersdempster-shafer evidence theoryfailure mode and effects analysisfuzzy risk evaluationfuzzy uncertaintymulti-sensor information fusion

More Related Videos

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
06:45

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Published on: October 28, 2022

2.2K
Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.2K
Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
06:45

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Published on: October 28, 2022

2.2K
Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Engineering
  • Risk Management
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is crucial for enhancing system reliability.
  • Traditional risk priority number (RPN) methods have limitations in risk evaluation.
  • Fuzzy risk evaluation is an emerging area in FMEA research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel model for fuzzy risk evaluation in FMEA.
  • To address the non-exclusiveness of fuzzy linguistic variable evaluations.
  • To improve the accuracy of risk assessment in FMEA.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing D numbers to model non-exclusive fuzzy evaluations.
  • Applying a D numbers-based multi-sensor information fusion method.
  • Comparing the proposed model with existing methods using an illustrative example.

Main Results:

  • The D numbers model effectively handles non-exclusive fuzzy evaluations.
  • The proposed fusion method enhances fuzzy risk evaluation in FMEA.
  • The new model demonstrates superior effectiveness compared to traditional approaches.

Conclusions:

  • D numbers provide a robust framework for fuzzy risk evaluation in FMEA.
  • Multi-sensor information fusion with D numbers improves risk prioritization.
  • This research offers a more effective tool for enhancing product and system reliability.