Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants
Published on: October 28, 2022
Biomechanical Measurement Error Can Be Caused by Fujifilm Thickness: A Theoretical, Experimental, and Computational
Ahmed Sarwar1, Simli Srivastava1, Chris Chu1
1Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.
Abstract:
This is the first study to quantify the measurement error due to the physical thickness of Fujifilm for several material combinations relevant to orthopaedics. Theoretical and experimental analyses were conducted for cylinder-on-flat indentation over a series of forces (750 and 3000 N), cylinder diameters (0 to 80 mm), and material combinations (metal-on-metal, MOM; metal-on-polymer, MOP; metal-on-bone, MOB). For the scenario without Fujifilm, classic Hertzian theory predicted the true line-type contact width as W = {(8FDcyl)/(πLcyl)[(1 - νcyl2)/Ecyl + (1 - νflat2)/Eflat]}1/2, where F is compressive force, Dcyl is cylinder diameter, Lcyl is cylinder length, νcyl and νflat are cylinder and flat Poisson's ratios, and Ecyl and Eflat are cylinder and flat elastic moduli. For the scenario with Fujifilm, experimental measurements resulted in contact widths of W = 0.1778 × F0.2273 × D0.2936 for MOM tests, W = 0.0449 × F0.4664 × D0.4201 for MOP tests, and W = 0.1647 × F0.2397 × D0.3394 for MOB tests, where F is compressive force and D is cylinder diameter. Fujifilm thickness error ratio W /W showed a nonlinear decrease versus cylinder diameter, whilst error graphs shifted down as force increased. Computational finite element analysis for several test cases agreed with theoretical and experimental data, respectively, to within 3.3% and 1.4%. Despite its wide use, Fujifilm's measurement errors must be kept in mind when employed in orthopaedic biomechanics research.
More Related Videos
11:28A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
06:18Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors