Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.7K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.7K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.5K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.5K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

42.7K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
42.7K
Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

269
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
269
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.9K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.9K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fleeting generalization: How unstable belief updating keeps people overly pessimistic about talking to strangers.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Adolescents' Preferred and Inferred Strategies for Being Accurately Understood by Their Parents.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2025
Same author

Defining key concepts for mental state attribution.

Communications psychology·2024
Same author

Misplaced Divides? Discussing Political Disagreement With Strangers Can Be Unexpectedly Positive.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

Surprisingly good talk: Misunderstanding others creates a barrier to constructive confrontation.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

Are Members of Political Out-Groups More Morally or Physically Disgusting?

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2023
Same journal

Metacognitive and Interpersonal Intellectual Humility Are Asymmetrically Associated with Well-Being.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Intergroup Contact and Belonging Among Ethiopian Jews in Ethiopia.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

A Taxonomy of Data Synthesis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

When and Why Beliefs About the Causes of a Policy Problem Predict Policy Support.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Prospects of Downward Mobility Cause Status Anxiety and Life Dissatisfaction.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Fluency as a Cue to Authenticity.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K

Exaggerating Accessible Differences: When Gender Stereotypes Overestimate Actual Group Differences.

Tal Eyal1, Nicholas Epley2

  • 11 Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|September 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Stereotypes can exaggerate group differences, especially when based on easily recalled traits. This study shows that readily accessible gender stereotypes about social sensitivity significantly inflate actual differences between men and women.

Keywords:
gender differencessocial judgmentsocial sensitivitystereotype accuracystereotypes

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Stereotype Research

Background:

  • Stereotypes are often assumed to exaggerate group differences, but empirical evidence is inconsistent.
  • The accessibility of specific stereotype content may moderate this exaggeration effect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether stereotype accessibility influences the exaggeration of actual group differences.
  • To test the hypothesis that easily accessible stereotype content leads to greater exaggeration.

Main Methods:

  • A pretest confirmed the accessibility of gender stereotypes, particularly regarding social sensitivity.
  • Three experiments were conducted to assess stereotype exaggeration using accessible and less accessible content, and individual judgments.

Main Results:

  • Accessible gender stereotypes about social sensitivity showed some accuracy but significantly exaggerated actual gender differences.
  • Less exaggeration was observed when using less accessible stereotype content or judging individuals directly.

Conclusions:

  • The accessibility of stereotype content plays a crucial role in determining the extent of stereotype exaggeration.
  • Understanding stereotype accessibility can explain variations in how stereotypes misrepresent group differences.