Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

420
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
420
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

261
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
261
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

714
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
714
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.9K
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification01:17

Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

215
Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
215

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

E-Cigarette Use, Dependence, and The Use of Protective Behavioral Strategies: A Path Model.

Substance use & misuse·2025
Same author

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Counterfactual and Personalized Normative Feedback Interventions to Increase Safe Drinking Strategies.

Substance use & misuse·2025
Same author

Diabetes and Wellness Smartphone Applications for Self-Management Among Adults With Diabetes in the United States.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2025
Same author

If Only I Could Drink Like Everyone Else: Effects of Counterfactual Thinking and Personalized Normative Feedback on Perceived Behavioral Control Over Drinking.

Psychiatry·2025
Same author

Understanding the effects of counterfactual thinking with protective behavioral strategies on healthy eating using the COM-B framework.

Appetite·2025
Same author

Self-control signals and affords power.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.2K

Motivational Differences in Seeking Out Evaluative Categorization Information.

Rachel Smallman1, Brittney Becker1

  • 11 Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|September 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People seek more detailed information when evaluating disliked options, influenced by factors like freedom of choice and decision-making style. This preference-categorization effect extends to how individuals gather evaluative data.

Keywords:
attributeevaluationinformation seekingpreferencerating

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.6K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.2K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.6K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individuals tend to use finer evaluative distinctions for liked versus disliked objects, a phenomenon known as the preference-categorization effect.
  • This effect may extend beyond forming evaluative distinctions to influencing the seeking of evaluative information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate motivational differences in how individuals seek evaluative information, specifically concerning rating scales and attributes.
  • To explore the influence of freedom of choice and sensitivity to punishment on information seeking.
  • To examine how choice optimization strategies (maximizing) affect evaluative information preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to examine evaluative information seeking.
  • Experiment 1 assessed the impact of freedom of choice and sensitivity to punishment (Behavior Inhibition System/Behavioral Approach System [BIS/BAS] scale) on information preferences in a health decision.
  • Experiment 2 investigated choice optimization by comparing maximizers' preferences for evaluative information in a consumer task.
  • Experiment 3 extended the investigation to evaluative categorization of attributes.

Main Results:

  • Freedom of choice and BIS/BAS sensitivity influenced preferences for desirable versus undesirable evaluative information.
  • Maximizers showed a preference for finer evaluative information for both liked and disliked options.
  • The preference-categorization effect was observed in the seeking of evaluative attributes.

Conclusions:

  • Motivational factors significantly shape the seeking of evaluative information.
  • The preference-categorization effect is a robust pattern that influences information acquisition strategies.
  • Understanding these motivational differences is crucial for comprehending decision-making processes.