Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.1K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.1K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

699
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
699
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

275
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
275
Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

903
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
903
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.7K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.1K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Time in mind: a multidisciplinary review on temporal perception, cognition, and memory.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Gaze cues and arrow cues modulate accuracy of recall of verbal items in a working memory task.

Open research Europe·2026
Same author

Sensorimotor transformation of number in the primate parietal cortex.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Feathered primate of the air: the carrion crow as model in cognitive neuroscience.

Lab animal·2026
Same author

Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors differentially control strength and dynamics of abstract decision codes in the primate prefrontal cortex.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Reaction-time signatures reveal divergent cognitive strategies underlying numerical decisions in monkeys and crows.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Crepuscular vocal partitioning and thermal limits on calling behavior in the Bubbling Kassina (Kassina senegalensis) in a sub-equatorial savanna.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Jewel beetles, Buprestidae, modulate bright structural colours by multileveled optical engineering and surface sculpting.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

E122Q rhodopsin: pigment microspectrophotometry, photoreceptor light responses, and bleaching adaptation.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Greater Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus nippon) gradually converge their echolocation call frequency to colony members.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Iridescence, polarisation and directionality of Morpho butterfly displays.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

10.0K

Comparing the face inversion effect in crows and humans.

Katharina F Brecht1,2, Lysann Wagener3, Ljerka Ostojić4

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. katharina.brecht@uni-tuebingen.de.

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|September 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Carrion crows do not show the face inversion effect, unlike humans. This suggests crows may not process faces as a special visual stimulus, possibly using other cues for recognition.

Keywords:
CategorizationCorvidDelayed matching-to-sampleFace inversionSocial cognition

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

10.0K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Ethology
  • Comparative Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Humans exhibit a face inversion effect, recognizing upright faces better than inverted ones, indicating faces are special stimuli.
  • Carrion crows possess advanced socio-cognitive abilities, prompting investigation into their face processing mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if carrion crows exhibit a face inversion effect, similar to humans.
  • To compare face recognition abilities between crows and humans using upright and inverted stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • A delayed matching-to-sample task was employed with two crows and human subjects.
  • Stimuli included upright and inverted crow faces, human faces, and control stimuli.
  • Performance was assessed based on accuracy in discriminating between stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Both crows and humans performed worse with inverted images compared to upright images.
  • Crows performed better with crow faces than human faces.
  • Neither crow demonstrated a face inversion effect, while human subjects did.

Conclusions:

  • Carrion crows do not process faces as a special visual stimulus in the way humans do.
  • Crows may rely on alternative cues (e.g., body features) or local feature processing for individual recognition.
  • This study highlights differences in face processing strategies between avian and primate species.