Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Definitive Abutments Placed at Implant Insertion and Never Removed: Is It an Effective Approach? A Systematic Review
Marco Tallarico1, Martina Caneva2, Silvio Mario Meloni3
1Adjunct Professor, Implantology and Prosthetic Aspects, Master of Science in Dentistry Program, Aldent University, Tirana, Albania; Private Practice, Rome, Italy.
Purpose:
To assess whether repeated abutment disconnections and reconnections have any impact on peri-implant bone resorption and soft tissue healing.
Materials And Methods:
Electronic and manual searches were conducted for English-language articles published up to March 2017 that identified a relation between repeated disconnections of implant abutments (PA group) and prosthetic or implant failures, complications, marginal bone loss (MBL), soft tissue healing, and esthetic evaluation (pink esthetic score [PES]) after at least 1 year of function compared with implants receiving a final abutment at the time of implant placement (DA group).
Results:
Fourteen articles (535 patients with 994 implants) were selected for qualitative analysis. Six of these were included in the meta-analysis. Five prostheses failed in the PA group and 1 failed in the DA group (P = .1047). Seven biologic complications occurred in the PA group and 6 occurred in the DA group (P = .8121). MBL was significantly less in the DA group (difference, 0.279 mm; P = .000). Greater buccal recession occurred in the PA group (difference, 0.198 mm; P = .0004). The PES evaluation showed no differences between groups (P = .289).
Conclusions:
Repeated abutment disconnections and reconnections considerably increased MBL and buccal recession. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
