Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

10:46
Corneal Donor Tissue Preparation for Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
Published on: September 17, 2014
15.7K
[Clinical research progress in endothelial keratoplasty]
1School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250022, China.
[Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi] Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
|September 20, 2017
Summary
Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) offers a safe and effective alternative to penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for endothelial dysfunction, providing good visual outcomes. Various EK techniques like DSEK, DSAEK, and DMEK continue to evolve with improved microsurgical advancements.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Microsurgery
Background:
- Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is increasingly preferred over penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for treating endothelial dysfunction in developed nations.
- EK procedures are recognized for their safety, efficacy, and ability to achieve excellent postoperative vision.
- Continuous advancements in microsurgical technology and instrumentation have led to ongoing improvements in EK surgical techniques and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the characteristics of various endothelial keratoplasty (EK) surgical techniques.
- To compare the postoperative effects and clinical outcomes of different EK methods.
- To discuss the advantages and potential complications associated with EK surgeries in comparison to penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical research on different endothelial keratoplasty (EK) surgical techniques.
- Analysis of characteristics, postoperative effects, and complications of EK procedures.
- Comparison of EK methods including Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and ultra-thin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK).
Main Results:
- Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has become the primary surgical approach for endothelial dysfunction, surpassing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).
- Different EK techniques (DSEK, DSAEK, DMEK, UT-DSAEK) offer distinct advantages.
- Ongoing improvements in microsurgical technology enhance the safety and effectiveness of EK procedures.
Conclusions:
- Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) represents a significant advancement in treating endothelial dysfunction, offering superior outcomes compared to PKP.
- The evolution of EK techniques, including DSEK, DSAEK, and DMEK, provides tailored options for patients.
- Further development in microsurgical technology promises continued enhancement of EK efficacy and patient vision restoration.

