How to value patient values: Cesarean sections for the periviable fetus, and home births

Respect for patient autonomy involves providing sufficient information to patients to allow them to make informed decisions, and then honoring their requests unless they are unethical or futile. At times, the factors that patients consider may not be purely biologic ones but rather will include "spiritual" factors (a sense of control in a home birth). When patients balance biologic risks against spiritual gain, physicians may not be comfortable giving deference to patients' choice. In order to explicate this issue we explore two clinical scenarios: home birth, and cesarean section for a periviable fetus; and we consider futility and limits on affirmative autonomy. We argue that bodily integrity must remain inviolate. However, conversations regarding a patient's affirmative rights invoke the moral agency of both patient and provider. Those conversations must include considerations of patient values as well as medical facts. Physicians' values are also part of counseling, but they are appropriately considered only when they are medical values (beneficence, truth telling), not personal beliefs (e.g., children with impairments should have, or not have, a 'do not resuscitate' order). Physicians have the right to refuse to participate if they think that the biologic risk overwhelms a potential value-based benefit, but they should be loath to do so if the balance is anywhere close to equipoise, and the patient's values are deeply held.