Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

37.7K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
37.7K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

16.9K
Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the...
16.9K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

541
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
541
Sympathetic Signaling01:31

Sympathetic Signaling

2.6K
Sympathetic signaling, a vital part of the autonomic nervous system, plays a crucial role in mobilizing the body's resources in response to stress or emergencies. It involves the transmission of nerve impulses from sympathetic preganglionic fibers to postganglionic fibers. This results in the release of specific neurotransmitters and activation of adrenergic receptors.
Sympathetic preganglionic fibers release the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) onto the ganglionic neurons in the...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rhizobia independently adapt to soil and legume host environments, but soil conditions influence the abundance of high-quality partners.

mBio·2026
Same author

Temporal analysis of reproduction distributed in space illuminates the climate-change resiliency of toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia).

American journal of botany·2026
Same author

Rapid adaptation and extinction in synchronized outdoor evolution experiments of <i>Arabidopsis</i>.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Genetic variation in host selectivity and adaptive strain enrichment in legume-rhizobia symbiosis: host-dependent, imperfect processes correlate with nodule morphology.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Mutations in legume genes that influence symbiosis create a complex selective landscape for rhizobial symbionts.

The ISME journal·2026
Same author

Don't ask "when is it coevolution?"-ask "how?"

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores
09:17

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

Published on: March 26, 2019

13.4K

Sanctions, Partner Recognition, and Variation in Mutualism.

Jeremy B Yoder, Peter Tiffin

    The American Naturalist
    |September 23, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary

    Mutualistic interactions can persist with variation in partner quality. Coevolution of partner signals and host recognition, alongside sanctions, maintains stable symbiotic relationships without eliminating genetic diversity.

    Area of Science:

    • Ecology
    • Evolutionary Biology
    • Behavioral Ecology

    Background:

    • Mutualistic interactions are vulnerable to invasion by "cheaters" (noncooperative individuals).
    • Selection against cheaters should reduce variation in partner quality, yet such variation is common in natural populations.
    • Partner signals, in addition to performance, may influence mutualism stability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To model the coevolution of symbiotic mutualism considering both partner performance and signals.
    • To investigate how host sanctions and symbiont signals coevolve.
    • To understand the persistence of genetic variation in mutualistic interactions.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a model of coevolution in symbiotic mutualism.
    • Incorporated separate genetic loci for host sanctions, host recognition of symbiont signals, symbiont cooperation, and symbiont signal expression.
    Keywords:
    coevolutionmutualismpopulation geneticssymbiosis

    More Related Videos

    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
    15:01

    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

    Published on: January 18, 2013

    16.0K
    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
    08:16

    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

    Published on: March 13, 2014

    19.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

    Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores
    09:17

    Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

    Published on: March 26, 2019

    13.4K
    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
    15:01

    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

    Published on: January 18, 2013

    16.0K
    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
    08:16

    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

    Published on: March 13, 2014

    19.5K
  • Utilized individual-based simulations with population structure.
  • Main Results:

    • Genetic variation in partner quality can persist without destabilizing the mutualistic interaction.
    • Coevolution of symbiont signals and host recognition is influenced by the coevolution of sanctions and cooperation.
    • Dual systems of sanctions and partner recognition can lead to stable mutualism, similar to economic models where incentives initiate symbiosis.

    Conclusions:

    • Mutualisms can maintain variation in partner recognition or sanctioning ability without destabilization.
    • Coevolutionary dynamics of signals and sanctions are crucial for mutualism stability.
    • Studies of mutualism should integrate communication (signals) with the exchange of benefits.