Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

07:34
FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
37.9K
A closer look at expanded carrier screening from a PGD perspective.
Carolina Vaz-de-Macedo1,2,3, Joyce Harper4
1Institute for Women's Health, 86-96 Chenies Mews, University College London, London WC1E 6HX, UK.
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|September 24, 2017
Summary
Expanded carrier screening offers broad genetic insights but presents challenges. Couples must be aware of limitations regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) eligibility and interpretation of results for reproductive planning.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Genetics
- Genetic Screening
- Genomics
Background:
- Traditional carrier screening relied on ethnicity and family history for limited genetic conditions.
- Expanded carrier screening now utilizes broad genetic panels for hundreds of disorders.
- The goal is to enhance reproductive autonomy through preconception knowledge and options like PGD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight challenges and limitations associated with expanded carrier screening.
- To inform patients and stakeholders about potential issues with PGD eligibility and result interpretation.
- To prompt a reevaluation of embryo testing and prioritization strategies in light of comprehensive screening.
Main Methods:
- Review of current practices and implications of expanded carrier screening panels.
- Analysis of potential limitations concerning PGD eligibility with heterogeneous conditions.
- Discussion of challenges arising from variants of uncertain significance and comprehensive carrier identification.
Main Results:
- Expanded panels may not guarantee PGD eligibility due to condition heterogeneity.
- Lack of family history in panel-identified couples necessitates new considerations for PGD.
- Increased incidence of complex genetic profiles (e.g., carrier + variant of uncertain significance) requires PGD discussion.
- Comprehensive screening necessitates reassessment of embryo testing and prioritization.
Conclusions:
- Patients must be informed about potential limitations of expanded carrier screening before testing.
- The interpretation of results, especially concerning PGD, requires careful consideration of individual circumstances.
- Stakeholders need to be aware of the challenges and limitations associated with positive results from expanded carrier screening panels.

