Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Rapid Fractionation and Isolation of Whole Blood Components in Samples Obtained from a Community-based Setting
Published on: November 30, 2015
RACE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL RISK: A Case Example from the Detroit Metropolitan
Amy J Schulz1, Graciela B Mentz1, Natalie Sampson2
1Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Racial segregation in Detroit leads to disproportionate environmental burdens for communities of color. These areas face higher risks from pollution, hazardous land, and social vulnerabilities, highlighting a need for environmental justice actions.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Environmental Justice
- Urban Planning
Background:
- Understanding the distribution of social and physical environments by race is crucial for documenting inequities.
- W. E. B. Du Bois's historical work provides a foundation for examining contemporary environmental disparities.
- Racial segregation in the United States, particularly in areas like Detroit, exacerbates environmental inequities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply and extend W. E. B. Du Bois's approach to analyze environmental exposures and vulnerabilities in Detroit.
- To map and quantify the distribution of physical environmental exposures, health risks, and social vulnerabilities across Census tracts.
- To assess the extent of disproportionate burdens experienced by communities of color in the Detroit metropolitan area.
Main Methods:
- Mapping the proximity of sensitive populations to hazardous land uses and air pollutant exposures.
- Assessing social vulnerabilities and cumulative risk (combined proximity, exposure, and vulnerability) across Census tracts.
- Quantitative analysis to confirm disparities in environmental exposures, health risks, and vulnerabilities by race.
Main Results:
- Census tracts with higher proportions of people of color disproportionately experience physical environmental exposures.
- Communities of color face greater socioeconomic and age-related vulnerabilities, along with higher cumulative risk.
- Statistical tests confirm significantly greater exposures and vulnerabilities in Census tracts with larger minority populations.
Conclusions:
- The study quantifies the inequitable distribution of environmental risk and vulnerability in the Detroit metropolitan area.
- Findings identify specific communities facing disproportionate cumulative risk, informing targeted interventions.
- Results highlight opportunities for policy and local actions to promote environmental justice and health equity.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Hazard Rate
Relative Risk
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

