Efficacy and safety of instantaneous wave-free ratio in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation: protocol for

Joey S W Kwong1, Sheyu Li2, Wan-Jie Gu3

  • 1Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.

BMJ Open
|October 1, 2017
PubMed

Insights

This systematic review protocol outlines an investigation into the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) for guiding coronary revascularisation. It aims to synthesize evidence on iFR

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate selection of coronary lesions for revascularisation is crucial for managing symptoms and improving outcomes in coronary artery disease patients.
  • The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a novel index for assessing coronary stenosis severity without requiring pharmacological vasodilation.
  • Emerging evidence supports the effectiveness of iFR-guided revascularisation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and controlled observational studies on iFR-guided coronary revascularisation.
  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical effectiveness of iFR compared to other methods in guiding revascularisation decisions.
  • To synthesize current evidence regarding the impact of iFR on patient outcomes and resource utilization.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane) and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies.
  • Inclusion of randomised controlled trials and controlled observational studies adhering to predefined eligibility criteria.
  • Data extraction by two independent reviewers, risk of bias assessment using validated tools, and meta-analysis using Review Manager software, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.

Main Results:

  • This section will present the synthesized findings from the included studies.
  • Quantitative and qualitative analyses will be performed to assess the efficacy and safety of iFR-guided revascularisation.
  • Results will be presented in accordance with the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews.

Conclusions:

  • The systematic review will provide a comprehensive assessment of the evidence for iFR-guided coronary revascularisation.
  • Findings will inform clinical practice guidelines and future research directions in interventional cardiology.
  • The review aims to clarify the role of iFR in optimising patient selection for revascularisation procedures.
Abstract