Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Preterm EEG: A Multimodal Neurophysiological Protocol
Published on: February 18, 2012
Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project
Fiona Ulph1, Stuart Wright2, Nimarta Dharni1
1Division of Mental Health and Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Parental knowledge of newborn screening (NBS) is low, with a preference for personalized information. Improving communication and offering choices enhances consent validity and cost-effectiveness, though further research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
- Informed Consent
Background:
- Parental consent for the UK Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NBSP) is mandatory, but concerns exist regarding its practical implementation and cost-effectiveness.
- Current practices may not ensure fully informed consent, impacting parental understanding and engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate various communication and consent models for newborn screening (NBS).
- To assess healthcare professionals' and parents' views on the feasibility, efficiency, and impact of different NBS information provision methods.
- To identify cost-effectiveness drivers for alternative NBS communication strategies.
Main Methods:
- A realist review to develop communication and consent models.
- Qualitative interviews with parents and health professionals.
- Surveys and observations of midwives regarding current costs and practices.
- Stated preference surveys to determine preferences for information delivery.
- Economic analysis to identify cost-effectiveness drivers.
- Stakeholder validation through focus groups and interviews.
Main Results:
- Low parental knowledge and evidence of coercive consent practices were identified.
- A preference for personalized information delivery, tailored to individual learning needs, was observed.
- Health professionals favored informed choice models, while parents supported them if informed about sample storage.
- Uniform information provision methods were found ineffective; personalized approaches enhance engagement, understanding, and consent validity.
- Key cost-effectiveness drivers included information provision methods and maternal anxiety.
Conclusions:
- Focusing on information receipt and addressing communication barriers is crucial for effective NBS.
- Personalized communication, midwife involvement during the third trimester, and clear information about sample storage enhance consent.
- While a choice in information provision improves cost-effectiveness and engagement, further research is needed before implementing new communication modes.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015