Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Testing of all Six Semicircular Canals with Video Head Impulse Test Systems
Published on: April 18, 2019
Effects of Device on Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) Gain
Kristen L Janky1, Jessie N Patterson2, Neil T Shepard3
1Boys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Audiology, Omaha, NE.
Video head impulse test (vHIT) gain varies significantly between devices, impacting comparisons. However, vHIT consistently differentiates normal from abnormal vestibular function across devices, with age not affecting gain up to 78 years.
Area of Science:
- Vestibular system diagnostics
- Ophthalmology
- Neurology
Background:
- Commercial video head impulse test (vHIT) devices calculate gain non-uniformly.
- Standardized evaluation of vHIT devices/algorithms is needed for comparing research using different gain calculations.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare horizontal canal vHIT gain across three commercial devices/algorithms in healthy adults.
- Assess the impact of age on vHIT gain in healthy adults for each device/algorithm.
- Evaluate the clinical performance of vHIT gain in differentiating normal from abnormal vestibular function across devices.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 61 healthy adults and 11 adults with vestibular loss.
- Administered vHIT using three devices/algorithms (Impulse, EyeSeeCam, VisualEyes) in randomized order on the same day.
- Analyzed gain using different calculation methods (area under the curve, instantaneous, position) and eye recording types (monocular, binocular).
Main Results:
- Significant mean differences in vHIT gain were observed among devices/algorithms for both healthy and vestibular loss groups.
- vHIT gain was larger in the ipsilateral direction of the measured eye, indicating a directional bias.
- Despite device differences and directional bias, vHIT consistently classified normal versus abnormal gain, except for instantaneous gain at 40 msec.
- Age did not significantly affect vHIT gain up to 78 years across all devices/algorithms.
Conclusions:
- vHIT gain values differ significantly between commercial devices/algorithms.
- Direct comparison of absolute vHIT gain values across studies using different devices/algorithms requires caution.
- vHIT remains a reliable tool for distinguishing normal from abnormal vestibular function despite inter-device variability.
More Related Videos
07:24Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025
10:12Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: May 23, 2013