Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

03:44
A Rapid Method to Confine and Safely Handle Bees in the Field
Published on: August 23, 2024
1.8K
DNA barcoding a nightmare taxon: assessing barcode index numbers and barcode gaps for sweat bees
Jason Gibbs1,1
1University of Manitoba, Department of Entomology, 12 Dafoe Rd., Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
Genome
|October 4, 2017
Summary
DNA barcoding shows a 20% error rate for identifying Lasioglossum (Dialictus) bees. While useful for discovery, DNA barcodes alone are insufficient for accurate species delimitation and identification without a clear barcode gap.
Area of Science:
- Entomology
- Molecular Biology
- Biodiversity Studies
Background:
- Ongoing global effort to DNA barcode over 20,000 bee species.
- Recent taxonomic revisions of Lasioglossum (Dialictus) in North America utilized integrative taxonomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate the utility of DNA barcode data for specimen identification and discovering new taxonomic diversity within Lasioglossum (Dialictus).
- Assess the effectiveness of Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) and barcode gaps for species delimitation.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed DNA barcode data from 110 Lasioglossum (Dialictus) species.
- Estimated specimen identification success using the best close match method.
- Assessed BINs using Refined Single Linkage Analysis (RESL) and barcode gaps using Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD).
Main Results:
- Observed a 20% error rate in specimen identification compared to current taxonomy.
- RESL showed incongruence for 44.5% of species, with 43 species in merged BINs.
- A distinct barcode gap was non-existent for the dataset; ABGD results mirrored RESL discordance.
Conclusions:
- DNA barcodes alone are misleading for species delimitation and identification in this group, particularly the viridatum species-group.
- Character-based methods may improve identification success in specific cases.
- The application of DNA barcoding for species discovery requires careful consideration, especially when a well-defined barcode gap is absent.

