Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021
Value Frameworks in Oncology: Comparative Analysis and Implications to the Pharmaceutical Industry
Mark Slomiany1, Priya Madhavan2, Michael Kuehn3
1Consultant, Market Access Health, GfK, New York, NY.
Value frameworks in oncology are emerging to address rising costs. While awareness and use vary, stakeholders anticipate increased utility as these tools become more established.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
- Value-Based Care
Background:
- Rising costs of cancer care necessitate new value assessment models.
- Diverse stakeholder concerns (patients, physicians, payers, policymakers, industry) shape these models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare the capabilities and limitations of five prominent oncology value frameworks.
- To assess the relative value and application of these frameworks for various stakeholders.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of framework methodology (input, scoring, output).
- Inclusion of stakeholder insights via physician/payer dialogues and secondary research.
- Evaluation of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Value Framework, National Comprehensive Cancer Network Evidence Blocks, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center DrugAbacus, Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Value Assessment Framework, and European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale.
Main Results:
- Frameworks differ in focus on clinical trial elements, evidence breadth, and weighting.
- Physician awareness and utilization of frameworks currently vary.
- Physicians anticipate greater future utility of value frameworks as they mature.
Conclusions:
- Physicians, policymakers, patients, and payers are actively defining value in oncology.
- Pharmaceutical companies are assessing framework impact on drug value and cost thresholds.
More Related Videos
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
13:34A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Bioequivalence: Overview
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...