Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

518
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
518
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

360
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
360
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

277
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
277
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

1.1K
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
1.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

290
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
290

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fathers' adverse childhood experiences and children's behavior problems.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same author

TREATMENT EFFECT HETEROGENEITY AND IMPORTANCE MEASURES FOR MULTIVARIATE CONTINUOUS TREATMENTS.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

Improvements in Cogstate Test Performance Depend on Number and Frequency of Prior Tests: Evidence from a Randomized Follow-Up Design.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·2026
Same author

Treatment Effect Reanalysis of the Randomized Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma With External Control Data.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Gabapentinoid Polypharmacy Among Medicare Beneficiaries During the Poststroke Recovery Period.

Health services research·2026
Same author

Associations between father-mother food parenting practices and children's dietary intake.

Public health nutrition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Mitigating Bias in Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The Case for Bayesian Nonparametrics.

Joseph Antonelli1, Lorenzo Trippa2, Sebastien Haneuse3

  • 1Postdoctoral Fellow, Deparment of Biostatistics, Harvard Chan School of Public Health, 655Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Statistical Science : a Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics
|October 6, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) can be misspecified if random effects distributions are not Normal. Nonparametric Bayesian analysis using a Dirichlet process (DP) prior reduces bias in fixed and random effects estimation with minimal efficiency loss.

Keywords:
Dirichlet process priorgeneralized linear mixed modelsmodel misspecificationrandom effects

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are standard for clustered/longitudinal data, assuming Normal random effects.
  • Misspecification of random effects distribution in GLMMs can invalidate standard estimation and inference.
  • Nonparametric Bayesian methods offer an alternative by not assuming a specific distribution for random effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of nonparametric Bayesian analysis with Dirichlet process (DP) priors for GLMMs.
  • To assess bias and efficiency in estimating fixed and random effects under various true random effects distributions.
  • To investigate methods for selecting the DP prior's precision parameter.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized nonparametric Bayesian analysis with a Dirichlet process (DP) prior for random effects distributions.
  • Examined operating characteristics for fixed and random effects estimation.
  • Investigated precision parameter selection strategies, including importance sampling and empirical Bayes.
  • Applied methods to analyze post-operative complications in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hysterectomy.

Main Results:

  • Dirichlet process (DP) prior modeling of random effects distributions significantly reduced bias.
  • The reduction in bias came with minimal loss of efficiency compared to standard methods.
  • Certain strategies for precision parameter selection, like importance sampling and empirical Bayes, yielded reasonable results across diverse scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Nonparametric Bayesian analysis with DP priors is a robust approach for GLMMs when random effects distributions are unknown or non-Normal.
  • This method offers substantial bias reduction in parameter estimation without compromising statistical efficiency.
  • Effective strategies exist for selecting the DP precision parameter, enhancing the practical applicability of this approach.