Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Law of Independent Assortment

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.

Dihybrid Crosses

Dihybrid Crosses

Law of Segregation

Law of Segregation

When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.

Monohybrid Crosses

Monohybrid Crosses

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

In 1866, Gregor Mendel published the results of his pea plant breeding experiments, providing evidence for predictable patterns in the inheritance of physical characteristics. The significance of his findings was not immediately recognized. In fact, the existence of genes was unknown at the time. Mendel referred to hereditary units as “factors.”

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

In Reply.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026

Same author

Interpretation of Pharmacometabolomics Results: Fingerprint of Drug Exposure or Confounder Effects? Insights from a Urinary Metabolomics Study with Voriconazole in Healthy Participants.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026

Same author

The phenotypic spectrum and genetic determinants of severe spinal muscular atrophy in individuals with a single <i>SMN2</i> copy: an international retrospective observational study.

EClinicalMedicine·2026

Same author

Urinary Metabolomics Predict Acute Kidney Injury in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants with Patent Ductus Arteriosus.

Biomolecules·2026

Same author

Confidence Intervals for Comparing Two Independent Folded Normals: A Case Study in Bunion Surgery.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Emulated Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in the General Population.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026

Same journal

Isolation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Modeling Melanoma Immune Surveillance by CAR-T Cells in Human Skin Organoids.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Stepwise Optimization of a Matrigel-Based In Vitro Angiogenesis Assay for Reproducible and Quantifiable 2D-Tube Formation Using HUVECs.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Quantifying Mechanical Properties of Fresh Ovarian Tissue with Optical Brillouin Microscopy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

3D Chromatin Architecture During Early Development: New Methods and New Findings.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Metabolic Plasticity in Embryogenesis Throughout the Lens of NAD<sup></sup>.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

Mendelian Randomization.

Sandeep Grover¹, Fabiola Del Greco M², Catherine M Stein³

¹Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)

|October 6, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants to overcome confounding in observational studies, enabling causal inference. This guide provides practical examples for applying MR with real data, enhancing its clinical utility despite challenges.

Keywords:

Causal inference Genome-wide association study Individual data Instrumental variable Mendelian randomization Observational epidemiology Pleiotropy Reverse causation Summary data Unobserved confounding

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Genetic Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

Observational studies face challenges with confounding and reverse causality, limiting clinical interpretation.
Randomizing exposure variables is often not feasible in observational research.
Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a powerful approach to address these limitations using genetic variants.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a practical, step-by-step guide for causal inference using Mendelian randomization.
To demonstrate the application of MR principles with real-world individual and summary data.
To offer best practices and recommendations for conducting GWAS-based MR.

Main Methods:

Utilizing genetic polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables for exposure variables.
Employing Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and meta-analyses of GWAS for large sample sizes.
Applying MR principles to both individual and summary-level data from unrelated individuals.

Main Results:

Demonstrates the feasibility of causal inference through MR with real datasets.
Highlights the utility of GWAS-derived SNPs in MR analyses.
Addresses challenges such as multiple causality in GWAS-based MR.

Conclusions:

Mendelian randomization is a robust technique for inferring causality despite statistical complexities.
Practical examples and best practices are crucial for advancing the application of MR.
This guide facilitates the use of MR for more reliable causal inference in research.