Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

08:10
Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
2.2K
Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular
Ryan Avery1, Kevin Day2, Clinton Jokerst3
1Department of Medical Imaging, Banner - University Medical Center, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, PO Box 245067, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA. ravery@radiology.arizona.edu.
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
|October 12, 2017
Summary
Cardiac MRI offers a reliable assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure patients with ICDs. However, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) assessment via first pass radionuclide angiography shows only moderate correlation with MRI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Advanced heart failure patients often have implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), posing challenges for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Radionuclide angiography, including planar multigated acquisition (MUGA) and first pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA), is used to assess ventricular function in these patients.
- Cardiac MRI is the reference standard for ventricular function assessment, but its use in ICD patients requires specific protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To correlate left and right ventricular ejection fractions calculated by radionuclide angiography with cardiac MRI in advanced heart failure patients with ICDs.
- To assess the agreement between cardiac MRI and echocardiographic/hemodynamic parameters for right ventricular function.
- To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in patients with ICDs using specialized protocols.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of advanced heart failure patients who underwent both cardiac MRI and radionuclide angiography.
- Analysis of ventricular functional parameters including LVEF and RVEF from both imaging modalities.
- Comparison of MRI findings with echocardiography and right heart catheterization data.
Main Results:
- Cardiac MRI and MUGA showed strong correlation for LVEF (R=0.9) with a mean discrepancy of 4.1%.
- Cardiac MRI and FPRNA demonstrated a moderate correlation for RVEF (R=0.5) with a mean discrepancy of 12.0%, which was statistically significant.
- Agreement between cardiac MRI and echocardiographic parameters (TAPSE, FAC) for RVEF was moderate.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac MRI provides accurate LVEF assessment in heart failure patients with ICDs.
- FPRNA shows only moderate correlation for RVEF compared to cardiac MRI, similar to echocardiographic parameters.
- Further research is needed to establish a more accurate method for RVEF estimation in pre-operative planning for ventricular assist device placement.
Keywords:
Automatic implantable cardiac deviceFirst pass radionuclide angiographyLeft ventricular ejection fractionMagnetic resonance imagingMultigated acquisition radionuclide angiographyRight ventricular ejection fraction
