COMPARISON BETWEEN INGUINAL HERNIOTOMIES WITH AND WITHOUT INCISING EXTERNAL OBLIQUE APONEUROSIS: A RANDOMIZED

Shahnam Askarpour1, Mehran Peyvasteh1, Shaghayegh Sherafatmand1

  • 1Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz, Khouzestan, Iran.

Insights

Pediatric inguinal herniotomy without incising the external oblique aponeurosis is a suitable alternative. This method showed no significant difference in recurrence or complications compared to the traditional approach, with fewer cases of hydrocele.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Surgical Techniques
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Inguinal herniotomy is a common surgical procedure in pediatric patients.
  • Evaluating surgical techniques is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare pediatric inguinal herniotomy with and without external oblique aponeurosis incision.
  • To assess recurrence rates and complications between the two surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • A blinded clinical trial involving 800 pediatric patients with indirect inguinal hernia.
  • Comparison of outcomes between herniotomy with and without external oblique aponeurosis incision.
  • Evaluation of complications including hernia recurrence, nerve damage, hematoma, and testicular issues.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in hernia recurrence or most complications between the two groups.
  • A significantly higher incidence of hydrocele was observed in the group with external oblique aponeurosis incision.

Conclusions:

  • Herniotomy without incising the external oblique aponeurosis is a viable and potentially advantageous option.
  • Pediatric patients may benefit from the less invasive approach, avoiding complications like hydrocele.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos