Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Precision beyond perfection: Navigating prosthodontics with the finite element method.

Medical journal, Armed Forces India·2026
Same author

Verekitug, a Novel Antibody Antagonist to the TSLP Receptor in Adults with Asthma: A 32-Week Randomized Phase 1b Multiple Ascending-Dose Trial.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025
Same author

Clinico-Etiological Profile of Young-Onset Dementia From a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Disparities in physician access for rheumatology, dermatology, and gastroenterology: a systematic review.

The American journal of managed care·2025
Same author

US health care disparities in immunology biologics access: a systematic review.

The American journal of managed care·2025
Same author

Elizabethkingia meningoseptica With Targeted Environmental Surveillance in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Cureus·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.5K

Form, Function, and Esthetics in Prosthetically Rehabilitated Maxillary Defects.

Manish Mittal1, Rohit Sharma2, Ashish Kalra3

  • 1Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, 11 Corps Dental Unit.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|October 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Maxillary obturator prostheses significantly improve quality of life for patients with midface defects. Magnet-retained obturators offered the best outcomes, enhancing function and social interaction.

More Related Videos

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
06:32

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction

Published on: December 5, 2025

727
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.5K
Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
06:32

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction

Published on: December 5, 2025

727
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Prosthodontics
  • Reconstructive Dentistry

Background:

  • Maxillofacial defects significantly impair patient quality of life.
  • Prosthetic rehabilitation using obturators is crucial for restoring function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze patient satisfaction with four different obturator designs for maxillary defects.
  • To assess the effectiveness of obturator rehabilitation using the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients with maxillary defects rehabilitated with conventional, cast partial, hollow bulb, or magnet-retained obturators (2009-2016).
  • Data collected included demographics, defect characteristics, and treatment details.
  • Patient satisfaction was subjectively assessed using the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS).

Main Results:

  • The mean OFS score was 5.67 (SD: 1.8), indicating fair and statistically significant improvements.
  • Improvements were noted in chewing, speech clarity, swallowing, pronunciation, and social interaction (P < 0.05).
  • Magnet-retained obturators yielded the best outcomes, followed by cast partial obturators.

Conclusions:

  • Different obturator designs play a vital role in the successful rehabilitation of maxillary defects.
  • Prosthetic rehabilitation with obturators leads to satisfactory patient outcomes and improved quality of life.