Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Office urodynamics.

A J Wein1, W S English, K E Whitmore

  • 1Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

The Urologic Clinics of North America
|November 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Urinary symptoms: broadening the horizons for the copeptin assay.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2019
Same author

Nocturia: current concepts and future perspectives.

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2012
Same author

Sympathetic innervation and chemical sympathectomy of canine bladder.

Urology·2011
Same author

Does race affect postoperative outcomes in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy?

Urology·2008
Same author

Depression, abuse and its relationship to interstitial cystitis.

International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction·2008
Same author

Radiofrequency ablation of small renal cell carcinomas using multitined expandable electrodes: preliminary experience.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2006
Same journal

An Unprecedented Era of Innovation in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Hubert Humphrey's Bladder Cancer: If He Could Have Time Traveled, Would that Have Changed the Outcome?

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Key Clinical Trials Shaping the Future of Superficial High-Risk Bladder Cancer Management.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Future Directions: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools in Bladder Cancer Care.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Economic Considerations in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Patient-Centered Approaches to Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Care.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Urologists should tailor urodynamic evaluations to their practice, incorporating essential tests like filling cystometry and flowmetry. These office-based urodynamic assessments aid in diagnosing and managing lower urinary tract conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
  • Diagnostic Procedures

Background:

  • Urodynamic evaluation is crucial for diagnosing lower urinary tract symptoms.
  • Practices vary in their approach to urodynamic testing and referral.
  • The definition of "office urodynamics" is not standardized across urology practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the essential components of office-based urodynamic evaluation.
  • To emphasize the adaptability of urodynamic techniques to individual urological practices.
  • To guide urologists in selecting appropriate urodynamic assessments for their clinical setting.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of common urodynamic techniques suitable for office settings.
  • Identification of core urodynamic procedures compatible with general urology practices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of the practical implementation of urodynamic evaluations in clinical practice.
  • Main Results:

    • Urologists can establish personalized indications and techniques for urodynamic evaluations.
    • Key office-compatible urodynamic tests include filling cystometry, flowmetry, and residual urine determination.
    • Voiding cystourethrography is noted as less commonly compatible with all office settings.

    Conclusions:

    • Urodynamic evaluation protocols should be customized by each urologist.
    • Essential urodynamic tests are feasible within most urological office environments.
    • Standardizing core urodynamic procedures can enhance diagnostic capabilities in urology practices.