Related Experiment Videos
Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left
Stian Ross1,2, Hans Henrik Odland1,2, Alfonso Aranda3
1Center for Cardiological Innovation, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannveien 20, Pb 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
Aims:
A difficult cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation scenario emerges when no lateral pacing option exists. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of biventricular pacing (BIVP) on vectorcardiographic parameters in patients with a non-lateral left ventricular (LV) lead position. We hypothesized that perimeter and area reduction for both the QRS complex and T-wave would predict acute CRT response.
Methods And Results:
Twenty-six patients (14 ischaemic) with a mean age of 63 ± 10 years and standard CRT indication underwent device implantation with continuous LV pressure registration. The LV lead was placed in either an anterior or apical position. Biventricular pacing was performed at a rate 10% above intrinsic rhythm with acute CRT response defined as LV ΔdP/dtmax >10%. Using this criterion 12 patients were identified as acute CRT responders (responders: 16.7 ± 4.8% vs. non-responders: 1.9 ± 5.3%, P < 0.001). Vectorcardiographic assessment of the QRS complex and T-wave were performed at baseline and under BIVP. Based on the observed changes in three-dimensional area and perimeter, ΔQRS-area (responders: -46.7 ± 39.6% vs. non-responders: 1.1 ± 50.9%, P = 0.006) was considered as the preferred parameter. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified -40% as the optimal cut-off value (sensitivity 67% and specificity 93%) for prediction of acute CRT response (AUC = 0.81, P < 0.01). A significant correlation was observed between LV ΔdP/dtmax and ΔQRS-area (R2 = 0.37, P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
ΔQRS-area is correlated to LV ΔdP/dtmax and predicts acute CRT response in patients with a non-lateral LV lead position. Assessment of ΔQRS-area might be a useful tool for patient specific LV lead placement when no lateral pacing option exists.