Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

13:04
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Testing an Incentive-Sensitisation Approach to Understanding Problem Slot-Machine Gambling Using an Online
Belinda Davey1, Robert Cummins2
1University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3065, Australia. Belinda.davey@unimelb.edu.au.
Journal of Gambling Studies
|October 18, 2017
Summary
Problem gamblers show stronger "wanting" than "liking" for gambling, unlike non-problem gamblers. This difference in motivational pathways helps explain addictive slot-machine behaviour.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Behavioural Science
Background:
- The incentive-sensitisation theory explains addiction by proposing that repeated substance use or behaviour sensitises neural pathways, leading to compulsive
- This sensitisation results in a stronger motivation to seek the stimulus (
- In gambling, this theory suggests problem gamblers (PGs) develop heightened
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the applicability of the incentive-sensitisation theory to slot-machine gambling behaviour.
- To differentiate the subjective experiences of
- To examine the predictive power of
Main Methods:
- A simulated online slot-machine task was used.
- 39 problem gamblers (PGs) and 87 non-problem gamblers (NPGs) participated.
- Participants rated their
Main Results:
- As predicted, PGs reported significantly greater
- PGs also exhibited greater
- While
Conclusions:
- The findings support the incentive-sensitisation theory's distinction between
- The study highlights the role of
- Future research should explore alternative indirect measures of
Keywords:
Craving, pleasure, problem gamblingGamblingHedonic rewardIncentive-sensitisationLikingPathological gamblingSlot-machineUrgeWanting
