Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transfer Function in Control Systems01:21

Transfer Function in Control Systems

1.7K
The transfer function is a fundamental concept in the analysis and design of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. It offers a concise way to understand how a system responds to different inputs in the frequency domain. It serves as a bridge between the time-domain differential equations that describe system dynamics and the frequency-domain representation that facilitates easier manipulation and analysis.
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
1.7K
Network Function of a Circuit01:25

Network Function of a Circuit

925
Frequency response analysis in electrical circuits provides vital insights into a circuit's behavior as the frequency of the input signal changes. The transfer function, a mathematical tool, is instrumental in understanding this behavior. It defines the relationship between phasor output and input and comes in four types: voltage gain, current gain, transfer impedance, and transfer admittance. The critical components of the transfer function are the poles and zeros.
925
The Dot Product01:26

The Dot Product

275
Measuring how one directional quantity affects another along a specific path involves comparing their orientation and strength. When two such quantities are represented using direction and amount, a numerical result is computed to show how much one acts along the path of the other. This result comes from a rule combining both inputs' horizontal and vertical parts and adding the results.This calculation gives a single value that grows larger when both inputs point in similar directions and...
275

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PAI-1 Inhibition in experimental venous thrombosis.

Phlebology·2026
Same author

Coupling of within-person changes in sleep quality and subjective cognition in community-dwelling adults.

Aging & mental health·2026
Same author

The effects of blood flow on the structure of venous thrombi.

Phlebology·2026
Same author

The Hidden Burden of Chronic Venous Disease: Insights from the Rotterdam Study.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2025
Same author

When spring becomes summer: global warming modifies seasonal patterns of thermoregulatory behaviour in a heliothermic lizard.

Journal of thermal biology·2025
Same author

Osteopontin and venous thromboembolism: a new link in the thromboinflammatory axis?

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
07:18

Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Published on: February 18, 2022

2.2K

Geometrical optical transfer function: is it worth calculating?

José A Díaz, Virendra N Mahajan

    Applied Optics
    |October 20, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Calculating the geometrical optical transfer function (GOTF) is slower and less accurate than the diffraction optical transfer function (DOTF). GOTF offers no advantage in optical design and is merely an approximation for significant aberrations.

    More Related Videos

    Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
    10:46

    Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation

    Published on: September 18, 2012

    19.3K
    Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
    04:54

    Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging

    Published on: June 16, 2023

    3.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

    Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
    07:18

    Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

    Published on: February 18, 2022

    2.2K
    Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
    10:46

    Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation

    Published on: September 18, 2012

    19.3K
    Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
    04:54

    Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging

    Published on: June 16, 2023

    3.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Optical engineering
    • Image quality assessment
    • Computational optics

    Background:

    • The optical transfer function (OTF) is crucial for evaluating imaging system performance.
    • Both geometrical optical transfer function (GOTF) and diffraction optical transfer function (DOTF) are used to characterize optical systems.
    • Comparing their computational efficiency and accuracy is essential for practical optical design.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the computational merit of the geometrical optical transfer function (GOTF) in optical design.
    • To compare the calculation time of GOTF against the diffraction optical transfer function (DOTF).
    • To determine the utility and accuracy of GOTF as an approximation of DOTF.

    Main Methods:

    • Calculating DOTF via numerical integration of pupil function autocorrelation, 2D digital autocorrelation, and Fourier transform (FT) of the point-spread function (PSF).
    • Calculating GOTF via FT of the geometrical PSF and FT of the spot diagram.
    • Utilizing wave aberrations (for DOTF) and transverse ray aberrations (for GOTF) as starting points.
    • Comparing computation times for primary aberrations and typical imaging systems.

    Main Results:

    • Direct numerical integrations for DOTF are computationally intensive.
    • GOTF calculation using FT of the spot diagram is 2-3 times slower than DOTF calculation using FT of the PSF.
    • GOTF accuracy is limited, serving only as an approximation for large aberrations.

    Conclusions:

    • GOTF calculation is computationally inefficient compared to DOTF.
    • GOTF provides no significant advantage in the optical design process.
    • The utility of GOTF is negated due to its slow computation and approximate nature.