Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026
08:26
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
1.8K
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery Still an Open Debate.
Francisco Schlottmann1, Marco G Patti2
11 Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A
|October 20, 2017
Summary
Minimally invasive surgery is not yet the standard of care in the US, despite its perceived prevalence. Significant variability in laparoscopic surgery utilization raises ethical and economic concerns for all stakeholders.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Innovation
- Healthcare Policy
Background:
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is often assumed to be the standard of care in the United States.
- Conventional open surgery is thought to be reserved for complex or redo procedures.
Discussion:
- Significant variability exists in the adoption and utilization of laparoscopic surgery across the US.
- This inconsistency in surgical care for common conditions presents ethical and economic challenges.
Key Insights:
- Laparoscopic surgery utilization is not uniform nationwide.
- Variability in surgical approaches impacts patient care and healthcare economics.
Outlook:
- Healthcare providers, insurance companies, and patients must critically examine the current landscape of surgical care.
- Addressing utilization disparities is crucial for equitable and efficient healthcare delivery.
