Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
Published on: August 15, 2010
To search or to like: Mapping fixations to differentiate two forms of incidental scene memory
Kyoung Whan Choe1, Omid Kardan1, Hiroki P Kotabe2
1Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract:
We employed eye-tracking to investigate how performing different tasks on scenes (e.g., intentionally memorizing them, searching for an object, evaluating aesthetic preference) can affect eye movements during encoding and subsequent scene memory. We found that scene memorability decreased after visual search (one incidental encoding task) compared to intentional memorization, and that preference evaluation (another incidental encoding task) produced better memory, similar to the incidental memory boost previously observed for words and faces. By analyzing fixation maps, we found that although fixation map similarity could explain how eye movements during visual search impairs incidental scene memory, it could not explain the incidental memory boost from aesthetic preference evaluation, implying that implicit mechanisms were at play. We conclude that not all incidental encoding tasks should be taken to be similar, as different mechanisms (e.g., explicit or implicit) lead to memory enhancements or decrements for different incidental encoding tasks.
More Related Videos
05:15The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
05:58Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Schemas
Storage
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Impact of Schemas
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...