Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Impact of initial aortic diameter and false-lumen area ratio on Type B aortic dissection prognosis
Akihito Matsushita1,2, Takashi Hattori1, Yu Tsunoda1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Seikeikai Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Insights
For uncomplicated acute Type B aortic dissection (ATBAD), initial aortic diameter ≥40mm and a larger false lumen are key predictors of adverse events. These patients may benefit from early endovascular intervention for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Medical management is standard for uncomplicated acute Type B aortic dissection (ATBAD).
- Endovascular treatment is a potential alternative, but patient selection remains unclear.
- Identifying risk factors for adverse events is crucial for guiding treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate outcomes in patients with uncomplicated ATBAD.
- To identify predictors of major adverse events (MAEs) in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 134 patients with uncomplicated ATBAD (2004-2015).
- Median follow-up of 47 months with a 98.5% follow-up rate.
- Multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of MAEs.
Main Results:
- In-hospital mortality was 0.7%.
- 1-, 3-, and 5-year freedom from MAEs were 79.8%, 71.4%, and 63.6%, respectively.
- Independent risk factors for MAEs included initial aortic diameter ≥40mm (HR 3.735) and false-lumen diameter > true-lumen diameter (HR 3.411).
Conclusions:
- Initial aortic diameter ≥40mm and a larger false lumen predict MAEs in uncomplicated ATBAD.
- Patients with these risk factors may benefit from early endovascular intervention.
- These findings aid in optimizing treatment strategies for ATBAD.
Objectives:
Medical treatment is the gold standard for uncomplicated acute Type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). Although endovascular treatment could become an alternative therapy, it is unclear which ATBAD patients should undergo endovascular intervention. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with uncomplicated ATBAD and identify the risk factors for major adverse events.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 134 consecutive patients who underwent initial treatment for uncomplicated ATBAD between 2004 and 2015. Follow-up rate was 98.5%, and the median follow-up period was 47 months. We evaluated the incidence of major adverse events (aortic-related death, aortic surgery and dilated aorta ≥ 55 mm) and identified the predictors of major adverse events using multivariable analysis.
Results:
In-hospital mortality rate was 0.7% (1/134). During follow-up, 46 patients had major adverse events. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of freedom from major adverse events were 79.8%, 71.4%, and 63.6%, respectively. The independent risk factors for major adverse events were initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm (hazard ratio 3.735, 95% confidence interval 1.888-7.390; P < 0.001) and false-lumen diameter > true-lumen diameter (hazard ratio 3.411, 95% confidence interval 1.491-7.806; P = 0.004).
Conclusions:
Initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm and false-lumen diameter > true-lumen diameter are predictors of major adverse events after uncomplicated ATBAD. Patients with these risk factors may benefit from early endovascular intervention.
Clinical Registration Number:
UMIN 000025388, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000029229.
More Related Videos
07:12Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
06:46Quantitative Micro-CT Analysis of Aortopathy in a Mouse Model of β-aminopropionitrile-induced Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection
Published on: July 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests