A Multicenter Phase I Study Evaluating Dual PI3K and BRAF Inhibition with PX-866 and Vemurafenib in Patients with Advanced BRAF V600-Mutant Solid Tumors
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

A Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model
Published on: May 20, 2019
Clinton Yam1,2, Xiaowei Xu1, Michael A Davies2
1Abramson Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology & Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract:
Purpose: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety of daily oral PX-866 in combination with twice daily vemurafenib and to identify potential predictive biomarkers for this novel combination.Experimental Design: We conducted a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. PX-866 was administered on a continuous schedule in combination with vemurafenib. Patients underwent a baseline and on-treatment biopsy after 1-week of PX-866 monotherapy for biomarker assessment.Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. The most common treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal side effects. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 rash and one DLT of grade 3 pancreatitis were observed in cohort 2 (PX-866 6 mg daily; vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily) and cohort 3 (PX-866 8 mg daily; vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily), respectively. Of 23 response-evaluable patients, seven had confirmed partial responses (PR), 10 had stable disease, and six had disease progression. Decreases in intratumoral pAKT expression were observed following treatment with PX-866. Patients who achieved PRs had higher rates of PTEN loss by IHC (80% vs. 58%) and pathogenic PTEN mutations and/or deletions (57% vs. 25%). Two patients with durable PRs had an increase in intratumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltration following treatment with PX-866.Conclusions: PX-866 was well tolerated at its maximum tolerated single-agent dose when given in combination with a modified dose of vemurafenib (720 mg twice daily). Response to treatment appeared to be associated with PTEN loss and treatment with PX-866 seemed to increase CD8+ T-cell infiltration in some patients. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 22-32. ©2017 AACR.
Insights
The combination of PX-866 and vemurafenib showed acceptable safety in patients with BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. Response was linked to PTEN loss, and PX-866 may enhance T-cell infiltration.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- BRAF V600 mutations are key drivers in various solid tumors.
- Targeted therapies like vemurafenib have shown efficacy but resistance remains a challenge.
- Novel combinations are needed to overcome resistance and improve patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and tolerability of daily oral PX-866 combined with twice-daily vemurafenib.
- To identify predictive biomarkers for response to this combination therapy.
- To evaluate the efficacy of the combination in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors.
Main Methods:
- Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study design.
- PX-866 administered daily with vemurafenib twice daily.
- Baseline and on-treatment biopsies for biomarker analysis (pAKT, PTEN, CD8+ T-cells).
Main Results:
- The combination was generally well-tolerated, with gastrointestinal side effects being most common.
- Partial responses (PR) were observed in 7/23 evaluable patients; 10 had stable disease.
- Decreased intratumoral pAKT, increased PTEN loss/mutations, and enhanced CD8+ T-cell infiltration correlated with response.
Conclusions:
- PX-866 is safe in combination with a modified dose of vemurafenib.
- PTEN loss is a potential predictive biomarker for response.
- PX-866 may enhance anti-tumor immunity by increasing CD8+ T-cell infiltration.
More Related Videos
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
09:29Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016