Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Epidemiology of paediatric trauma presenting to US emergency departments: 2006-2012
Jacob B Avraham1, Misha Bhandari2,3, Spiros G Frangos4
1Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Insights
Paediatric traumatic injury emergency department visits decreased annually, but costs significantly increased. Trauma centers are vital for severely injured children, and most injuries are preventable.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Trauma Care
Background:
- Traumatic injury is a primary cause of death and disability in US children.
- Updated national data on emergency department (ED) discharges for paediatric traumatic injury are presented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in paediatric traumatic injury emergency department visits.
- To examine injury mechanisms, severity, costs, intent, and the role of trauma centers.
Main Methods:
- Descriptive epidemiological analysis of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Survey (2006-2012).
- Tracking changes in injury mechanism, severity, cost, intent, and trauma center utilization.
Main Results:
- An 8.3% decrease in annual ED visits for paediatric traumatic injury from 2006 to 2012.
- Traumatic brain injury diagnoses increased by 22.2%; intentional assault accounted for 3% of injuries.
- Total cost of care increased by 78% to $23 billion, despite a decline in motor vehicle injuries.
Conclusions:
- Paediatric trauma care in the USA shows a critical role for trauma centers.
- The majority of paediatric traumatic injuries are preventable, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.
Background:
Traumatic injury is the leading cause of paediatric morbidity and mortality in the USA. We present updated national data on emergency department (ED) discharges for traumatic injury for a recent 7-year period.
Methods:
We conducted a descriptive epidemiological analysis of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Survey, the largest and most comprehensive database in the USA, for 2006-2012. Among children and adolescents, we tracked changes in injury mechanism and severity, cost of care, injury intent and the role of trauma centres.
Results:
There was an 8.3% (95% CI 7.7 to 8.9) decrease in the annual number of ED visits for traumatic injury in children and adolescents over the study period, from 8 557 904 (SE=5861) in 2006 to 7 846 912 (SE=5191) in 2012. The case-fatality rate was 0.04% for all injuries and 3.2% for severely injured children. Children and adolescents with high-mortality injury mechanisms were more than three times more likely to be treated at a level 1 trauma centre (OR=3.5, 95% CI 3.3 to 3.7), but were more no more likely to die (OR=0.96, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.00). Traumatic brain injury diagnoses increased 22.2% (95% CI 20.6 to 23.9) during the study period. Intentional assault accounted for 3% (SE=0.1) of all child and adolescent ED injury discharges and 7.2% (SE=0.3) of discharges among 15-19 year-olds. There was an 11.3% (95% CI 10.0 to 12.6) decline in motor vehicle injuries from 2009 to 2012. The total cost of care was $23 billion (SE=0.01), a 78% increase from 2006 to 2012.
Conclusions:
This analysis presents a recent portrait of paediatric trauma across the USA. These analyses indicate the important role and value of trauma centre care for injured children and adolescents, and that the most common causes and mechanisms of injury are preventable.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
07:52Expired CO2 Measurement in Intubated or Spontaneously Breathing Patients from the Emergency Department
Published on: January 29, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Emerging Adulthood
Introduction to Epidemiology
Causality in Epidemiology
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies