Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

12.8K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
12.8K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.0K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

28.4K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
28.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

618
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
618
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing metadata privacy in neuroimaging.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

A sensitivity analysis of preprocessing pipelines: Toward a solution for multiverse analyses.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Building Multivariate Molecular Imaging Brain Atlases Using the NeuroMark PET Independent Component Analysis Framework.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

One hundred years of EEG for brain and behaviour research.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

On the Long-term Archiving of Research Data.

Neuroinformatics·2023
Same author

Coupling cognitive and brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis-related chronic neuropathic limb pain.

Brain communications·2022
Same journal

Sentiment Analysis of Acceptance TVET Online Courses on the Skill Academy App from Google Play: Leveraging Text Mining with Comparison Machine Learning Model.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Emotional intelligence: An important skill to learn now more than ever.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

East Mediterranean Lineage of <i>Brucella melitensis</i> in Human Isolates and Milk Samples in Oman Using MLVA-14.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Application of K-Means Clustering for Job Applicant Analysis in Construction Firms Using R.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

The influence of self-esteem and emotional intelligence on addiction to social networks in Peruvian university students.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

A Bibliometric Analysis of Music's Role in Promoting Well-Being in Health Science Research.

F1000Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice
09:13

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice

Published on: July 11, 2025

30.2K

Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial.

Cyril Pernet1

  • 1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (CCBS), Neuroimaging Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

F1000Research
|October 31, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is widely used despite criticism. This tutorial clarifies NHST concepts, p-value interpretation, and confidence intervals to prevent errors and improve reporting practices in scientific research.

Keywords:
confidence intervalsnull hypothesis significance testingp-valuereportingtutorial

More Related Videos

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
06:48

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil

Published on: July 29, 2020

5.2K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice
09:13

Hypoxia Alters miRNAs Levels Involved in Non-Mendelian Inheritance of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mice

Published on: July 11, 2025

30.2K
Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
06:48

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil

Published on: July 29, 2020

5.2K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biological sciences
  • Biomedical sciences
  • Social sciences

Background:

  • Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is a prevalent statistical method for evidence generation.
  • Despite widespread use, NHST faces significant criticism.
  • Common interpretation errors exist regarding p-values and confidence intervals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify fundamental concepts of NHST.
  • To distinguish between Fisher's significance test and Neyman-Pearson's acceptance test.
  • To address and prevent common misinterpretations of p-values and confidence intervals.
  • To propose best practices for statistical reporting in scientific contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual summary of NHST.
  • Explanation of significance testing (Fisher) and acceptance testing (Neyman-Pearson).
  • Discussion of confidence intervals and their interpretation.
  • Analysis of common errors in statistical interpretation.
  • Recommendations for reporting statistical findings.

Main Results:

  • NHST remains a dominant statistical approach in multiple scientific disciplines.
  • P-values and confidence intervals are frequently misinterpreted.
  • Clearer understanding of statistical concepts is needed to avoid errors.
  • Standardized reporting practices can enhance scientific rigor.

Conclusions:

  • Clarifying NHST concepts and interpretation is crucial for accurate scientific communication.
  • Avoiding common errors in p-value and confidence interval interpretation is essential.
  • Adopting recommended reporting practices will improve the reliability of scientific evidence.