Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

50.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.2K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

39.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.2K
Routes of Persuasion02:20

Routes of Persuasion

68.8K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
68.8K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

268
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
268

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Input-driven dynamics for robust memory retrieval in Hopfield networks.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Multistability and anomalies in oscillator models of lossy power grids.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Predictive models for human-AI nexus in group decision making.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2022
Same author

A network formation game for the emergence of hierarchies.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Structural balance emerges and explains performance in risky decision-making.

Nature communications·2019
Same author

Mathematical Structures in Group Decision-Making on Resource Allocation Distributions.

Scientific reports·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K

How truth wins in opinion dynamics along issue sequences.

Noah E Friedkin1,2, Francesco Bullo3,4

  • 1Center for Control, Dynamical Systems and Computation, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; friedkin@soc.ucsb.edu.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|October 27, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding how truth prevails in social groups remains a challenge. This study introduces a network science model of opinion dynamics, demonstrating its effectiveness in explaining how truth wins within groups.

Keywords:
network scienceopinion dynamicstruth statements

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.3K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.3K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Network Science
  • Mathematical Modeling

Background:

  • The conditions under which truth is abandoned or consensus is reached in social groups are not fully understood.
  • Existing research presents mixed findings on truth-related dynamics in group settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a mathematical model integrating interpersonal influence and opinion dynamics.
  • To clarify the mechanisms by which truth prevails in social groups.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a general model from network science focusing on opinion dynamics.
  • Applied mathematical modeling to simulate interpersonal influence within social groups.

Main Results:

  • The proposed opinion dynamics model substantially clarifies how truth wins in groups.
  • Evidence suggests the model effectively integrates findings on truth abandonment and consensus.

Conclusions:

  • A network science approach to opinion dynamics provides a robust framework for understanding truth propagation in social groups.
  • The developed model offers a unified explanation for previously mixed findings in social truth studies.