Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions and platelet reactivity
Björn Redfors1, Philippe Généreux2, Bernhard Witzenbichler3
1Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, United States.
Insights
Successful bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) still carries a higher risk of adverse events. Stenting both branches significantly increases this risk, independent of residual platelet reactivity.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presents unique challenges, often linked to lower success rates and increased complications.
- Limited data exist on outcomes following successful bifurcation PCI using modern stents and techniques.
- The impact of residual platelet reactivity (PR) on outcomes after bifurcation versus non-bifurcation PCI remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing successful bifurcation PCI compared to non-bifurcation PCI.
- To investigate the association between bifurcation PCI, residual platelet reactivity (PR), and adverse cardiovascular events.
- To assess the impact of stenting both bifurcation branches on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the prospective, multicenter ADAPT-DES study.
- Stratification of 8582 patients into bifurcation PCI and non-bifurcation PCI groups.
- Comparison of two-year outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models, defining target vessel failure (TVF) as a composite endpoint.
Main Results:
- Bifurcation PCI (15% of patients) was independently associated with a higher risk of TVF (aHR 1.26, p=0.003), driven by increased myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.
- No significant interaction was found between PR and bifurcation PCI for TVF risk (pinteraction=0.87).
- Stenting both bifurcation branches significantly elevated TVF risk (aHR 1.91 vs. non-bifurcation PCI, ptrend<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Bifurcation PCI is linked to an increased risk of adverse ischemic events at two years compared to non-bifurcation PCI.
- The risk is substantially higher when both branches of a bifurcation are stented.
- High residual platelet reactivity (HPR) poses a similar risk for both bifurcation and non-bifurcation PCI patients.
Background:
Although bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with lower procedural success rates and higher risk of complications, there are little data regarding outcomes after successful bifurcation PCI with contemporary stents and techniques. Whether residual platelet reactivity (PR) affects outcomes differently after bifurcation versus non-bifurcation PCI is also unknown. We studied the association between bifurcation PCI, PR, and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing successful PCI with drug-eluting stents.
Methods:
Patients in the prospective, multicenter ADAPT-DES study were stratified according to whether they underwent bifurcation PCI. Two-year outcomes were compared between groups using Cox proportional hazards models. Target vessel failure (TVF) was defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.
Results:
Among the 8582 patients included in ADAPT-DES, 1276 (15%) had bifurcation PCI. Bifurcation PCI was independently associated with increased risk of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.46, p=0.003), driven by higher risk of myocardial infarction (5.9% vs. 4.6%, p=0.033) and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (13.0% vs. 9.2%, p<0.0001). There was no statistical interaction between PR and bifurcation PCI regarding TVF risk (adjusted pinteraction=0.87). Stenting of both bifurcation branches was associated with the highest risk of TVF (adjusted HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.48-2.46 versus non-bifurcation PCI; ptrend<0.001).
Conclusions:
Bifurcation PCI is associated with a higher risk of 2-year adverse ischemic events than non-bifurcation PCI, a risk that is particularly high when both bifurcation branches are stented, and with HPR conferring similar risk for bifurcation and non-bifurcation PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction

