Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026
11:09
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
Published on: July 17, 2021
3.4K
A "Trans-Dyadic" Perspective on the Goldwater Rule
1PLAKUN: Associate Medical Director, Director of Biopsychosocial Advocacy, Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, MA; and Leader, American Psychiatric Association Psychotherapy Caucus, Arlington, VA.
Journal of Psychiatric Practice
|October 28, 2017
Summary
The Goldwater Rule, concerning psychiatric commentary on public figures, can be understood through large group psychology. This perspective offers insights into leadership without violating ethical diagnostic privacy rules.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Psychoanalysis
- Sociology
Background:
- The Goldwater Rule, restricting psychiatrists from commenting on public figures' mental health without direct examination, has faced renewed debate.
- This debate intensified following the election of Donald Trump, prompting re-evaluation of the rule's application and ethical boundaries.
- Current discussions often focus on individual diagnosis, overlooking broader societal and group dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To offer a novel perspective on the Goldwater Rule, moving beyond individual psychiatric diagnosis.
- To explore leadership through a psychoanalytic lens, specifically "trans-dyadic" understanding of large group processes.
- To introduce concepts from large group psychology to reframe the discussion on public figures and psychiatric commentary.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Goldwater Rule through the theoretical framework of psychoanalytic large group psychology.
- Application of "trans-dyadic" concepts to understand leadership dynamics at a societal level.
- Integration of insights from large group psychology to inform perspectives on public figures and ethical considerations.
Main Results:
- A framework is presented for analyzing leadership that transcends individual psychiatric diagnosis.
- The "trans-dyadic" lens provides a method for understanding societal-level group processes influencing public perception.
- Psychoanalytic concepts from large group psychology offer a way to discuss public figures without breaching the Goldwater Rule.
Conclusions:
- The Goldwater Rule's ethical considerations can be addressed by shifting focus from individual diagnosis to group dynamics.
- Psychoanalytic understanding of large group processes offers valuable insights into leadership and societal dynamics.
- A "trans-dyadic" perspective provides a viable alternative for discussing public figures within ethical psychiatric guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
01:34Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
4.1K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
4.1K
01:20Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
284
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
284
04:49Robbers Cave
14.9K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.9K
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
19.0K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
19.0K
01:17Correspondence Bias
240
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
240
02:12Relationship Formation
46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K