Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Trophic Efficiency00:46

Trophic Efficiency

25.4K
Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.
25.4K
Trophic Levels01:35

Trophic Levels

38.1K
All organisms in an ecosystem occupy a trophic level in the food chain. The lowest level consists of primary producers, which synthesize their food from either solar or chemical energy. Each subsequent level obtains energy from the levels below. Detritivores can occupy any of the levels above primary producers.
38.1K
Primary Production01:06

Primary Production

25.7K
The total amount of energy acquired by primary producers in an ecosystem is called gross primary production (GPP). However, of this energy, producers use some for metabolic processes, and some is lost as heat, decreasing the amount of energy available to the next trophic level. The remaining usable amount of energy is called the net primary productivity (NPP). In terrestrial ecosystems, NPP is driven by climate, while light penetration and nutrient availability drive NPP in aquatic ecosystems.
25.7K
Keystone Species01:39

Keystone Species

25.1K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
25.1K
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

37.7K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
37.7K
Operon Model01:23

Operon Model

1.6K
The operon model represents a fundamental mechanism of gene regulation in prokaryotes, enabling coordinated expression of genes involved in related metabolic or functional pathways. Operons consist of structural genes, a promoter, and an operator, with transcription regulated by repressors, activators, and small effector molecules.Structure and Function of OperonsAn operon is a cluster of structural genes transcribed together under the control of a single promoter. The promoter region...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divergence From Temperate Models: Pollution Dominance and Stochastic Assembly in a Continental Freshwater System Under Compressed Modernity.

Global change biology·2026
Same author

A unified analysis of global riverine eDNA reveals common associations of fish biodiversity with drainage characteristics.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Biodiversity and habitat complexity buffer the destabilizing effects of anthropogenic activities on riverine fish communities.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Climatic Legacies Drive Spatial Aggregation of Plants in Drylands.

Global change biology·2026
Same author

Local Resource Availability and Subsidy Flow Mediate the Effects of Disturbances in Meta-Ecosystems.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

From proteins to species ranges: a framework for understanding thermal adaptation during range expansions.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

8.0K

Upstream trophic structure modulates downstream community dynamics via resource subsidies.

Eric Harvey1,2, Isabelle Gounand1,2, Chelsea J Little1,2

  • 1Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zürich Switzerland.

Ecology and Evolution
|November 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Upstream species interactions alter downstream ecosystems by changing resource flow, even without organism dispersal. This demonstrates how habitat structure can indirectly link distant biological communities.

Keywords:
cross‐ecosystem subsidiesdirectional flowsmeta‐ecosystemsriver ecosystems

More Related Videos

Understanding Dissolved Organic Matter Biogeochemistry Through In Situ Nutrient Manipulations in Stream Ecosystems
09:38

Understanding Dissolved Organic Matter Biogeochemistry Through In Situ Nutrient Manipulations in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.1K
Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
12:24

Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey

Published on: August 29, 2014

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

8.0K
Understanding Dissolved Organic Matter Biogeochemistry Through In Situ Nutrient Manipulations in Stream Ecosystems
09:38

Understanding Dissolved Organic Matter Biogeochemistry Through In Situ Nutrient Manipulations in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.1K
Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
12:24

Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey

Published on: August 29, 2014

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem Dynamics
  • Community Ecology

Background:

  • Landscape structure influences resource flow in natural systems.
  • Indirect coupling of community dynamics via resource flows is known, but directional effects are less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if upstream community structure affects downstream community dynamics without organism dispersal.
  • To investigate how directional resource flows mediate indirect ecological links.

Main Methods:

  • Used protist microcosms with controlled, directional resource flows.
  • Implemented upstream communities with contrasting interaction structures.
  • Assessed downstream communities with one or two trophic levels.

Main Results:

  • Upstream species interactions influenced upstream population sizes and biomass.
  • Varying detritus transfer from upstream to downstream communities was observed.
  • Downstream population densities and trophic interactions were predictably affected by upstream conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Species interaction structure in upstream habitats significantly mediates downstream alterations.
  • Directional resource flows can cascade effects to downstream communities, independent of dispersal.
  • Ecosystem structure plays a crucial role in linking spatially separated biological communities.